Re: [gentoo-dev] Abuse by gentoo developer

2005-07-19 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 02:35, Allen Parker wrote: > On another note, Casey, you should attempt to figure out if > anything you've said might have been taken the wrong way... Oh, I know it was. If everything I said was taken how I meant it then there wouldn't have been a disagreement. However

Re: [gentoo-dev] Abuse by gentoo developer

2005-07-19 Thread Daniel Goller
Allen Parker wrote: > >yah, what he said! > > >On another note, Casey, you should attempt to figure out if anything >you've said might have been taken the wrong way... a while back, i >managed to get myself banned from #apache after going off like an >idiot and then making a comment that was inter

Re: [gentoo-dev] Abuse by gentoo developer

2005-07-19 Thread Robin H. Johnson
I'm not going to address Jory's behaviour here, but I would like to look at the actual development stuff, namely the SUID status of vchkpw, as I took care of vpopmail before Jory came on board. On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 01:32:30AM +, Casey Allen Shobe wrote: > > I would strongly recommend doing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Abuse by gentoo developer

2005-07-19 Thread Allen Parker
yah, what he said! On another note, Casey, you should attempt to figure out if anything you've said might have been taken the wrong way... a while back, i managed to get myself banned from #apache after going off like an idiot and then making a comment that was interpreted as sarcasm when i was

Re: [gentoo-dev] Abuse by gentoo developer

2005-07-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 19 July 2005 10:21 pm, Nathan L. Adams wrote: i think Nathan did a pretty good job of summing up anything i thought i might add ;) -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Abuse by gentoo developer

2005-07-19 Thread Nathan L. Adams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > The will not allow it and I will not allow someone to go fooling in > an ebuild I maintain. Not trying to be an ass here but we have > something called respect for others when it comes to the tree and > what they maintain. Poor Jory. Respect isn'

Re: [gentoo-dev] Abuse by gentoo developer

2005-07-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 19 July 2005 09:32 pm, Casey Allen Shobe wrote: > Hello all, I'm sorry to bring this here, but I don't know where else > to take it, and feel that I was treated really unfairly. in this case you would want to take it up with devrel (short for Developer Relations) you can find their ho

Re: [gentoo-dev] Abuse by gentoo developer

2005-07-19 Thread Mauricio Lima PIlla
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/policy.xml "Developer relations should only be involved in a conflict when other attempts to solve the issue have failed. Developers should attempt polite discussion relating to the matter at hand to resolve conflict between themselves. Developers within a sing

[gentoo-dev] Abuse by gentoo developer

2005-07-19 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
Hello all, I'm sorry to bring this here, but I don't know where else to take it, and feel that I was treated really unfairly. As you know, I recently inquired about ebuild development on this list, and mentioned vpopmail. Jory Pratt answered my mail and suggested that I submit a patch. I then