On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 10:37 +, Duncan wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri,
> 12 Oct 2007 17:22:54 -0700:
>
> > Steve Long wrote:
> >> Duncan wrote:
> >> > Steve Dibb posted:
> >> >
> >> >> there is more than one mp3 encoder.
> >>
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri,
12 Oct 2007 17:22:54 -0700:
> Steve Long wrote:
>> Duncan wrote:
>> > Steve Dibb posted:
>> >
>> >> there is more than one mp3 encoder.
>> >
>> > [S]houldn't the description mention that?
>>
> How about:
>
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 07:26 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> Duncan wrote:
>
> > Steve Dibb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > excerpted below, on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:55:01 -0600:
> >
> >> The reason we have mp3 and lame use flag is because there is more than
> >> one mp3 encoder. In a
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 12 Oct 2007
12:35:30 +0200:
> what about mp3=lame or mp3=ffmpeg? This will also be easily extendable
> when the next implementations comes along (mp3=newmp3lib).
I gotta admit... I didn't quite under
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:26:12
+0100:
>> In that case, shouldn't the description mention that? Something like:
>>
>> MP3 encoding support using LAME (as opposed to ffmpeg)
>>
> What about when the next one gets added-- wou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Long wrote:
> Duncan wrote:
>
>> Steve Dibb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>> excerpted below, on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:55:01 -0600:
>>
>>> The reason we have mp3 and lame use flag is because there is more than
>>> one mp3 encoder.
Duncan wrote:
> Steve Dibb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> excerpted below, on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:55:01 -0600:
>
>> The reason we have mp3 and lame use flag is because there is more than
>> one mp3 encoder. In almost every case of the use flag being applied
>> above, there is a
Steve Dibb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:55:01 -0600:
> The reason we have mp3 and lame use flag is because there is more than
> one mp3 encoder. In almost every case of the use flag being applied
> above, there is already support for anoth
