[gentoo-dev] Re: irregular metdata.xml check - 3rd edition

2008-02-12 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Thilo Bangert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > dev-util/crossvc empty > > app-emulation/virtinst missing > dev-dotnet/dbus-glib-sharp missing > dev-dotnet/dbus-sharpmissing > dev-libs/dclog missing > dev-u

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: irregular metdata.xml check

2007-06-10 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 02:58:27PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: > I agree here, we have many packages that are assigned to a herd, with a > certain member of that herd listed as maintainer. For example I'll use > freetype since I've been working on it today: > No matter what, if the herd tag is no

[gentoo-dev] Re: irregular metdata.xml check

2007-06-10 Thread Ryan Hill
Thilo Bangert wrote: > "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> See the thread about automatic assignment for more about this. >> More importantly, once the automatic stuff goes into play, the >> existence of the herd tag will only matter on metadata that does not >> have any other maintain

[gentoo-dev] Re: irregular metdata.xml check

2007-05-23 Thread Markus Ullmann
Chris Gianelloni schrieb: > The point is that in cases where the herd > name doesn't equal the email address used for that herd, the maintainer > tag should probably be filled in with the proper email address. I think we have herds.xml for a good reason ;) -Jokey -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing li