Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The usefulness of test in FEATURES

2005-05-01 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Sunday 01 May 2005 04:43, R Hill wrote: > Maybe a way of lessening the annoyance of test failures would be having > a way to resume the build at the install phase. I'm thinking of > something similar the touch ${BUILDDIR}/.compiled trick. as it is, if > you remove test from FEATURES, touch .te

[gentoo-dev] Re: The usefulness of test in FEATURES

2005-05-01 Thread R Hill
Georgi Georgiev wrote: maillog: 30/04/2005-13:43:42(-0600): R Hill types Maybe a way of lessening the annoyance of test failures would be having a way to resume the build at the install phase. I'm thinking of something similar the touch ${BUILDDIR}/.compiled trick. as it is, if you remove test

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The usefulness of test in FEATURES

2005-04-30 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 30/04/2005-13:43:42(-0600): R Hill types > Maybe a way of lessening the annoyance of test failures would be having > a way to resume the build at the install phase. I'm thinking of > something similar the touch ${BUILDDIR}/.compiled trick. as it is, if > you remove test from FEATURES,

[gentoo-dev] Re: The usefulness of test in FEATURES

2005-04-30 Thread R Hill
Maurice van der Pot wrote: It's understandable that fixing this is a low priority thing, but what I would like to propose is to either fix the tests or disable them. The latter would be the thing to do for devs who are currently closing bugs about tests with WONTFIX or similar. If fixing the tes