Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Signing everything, for fun and for profit

2006-05-20 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 06:54:44AM -0400, Peter wrote: > On Thu, 18 May 2006 23:45:17 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > >The problem, in short, is how to handle the checksumming and signing of > >gentoo-provided files so that manipulation by external entities becomes > >difficult. > all snip... > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Signing everything, for fun and for profit

2006-05-20 Thread Chris Bainbridge
On 20/05/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: PMFJI, but as a user, not a security expert, I had a few thoughts that I'd like to throw in. Thanks to Patrick, he helped me to drill down some of the ideas and I present them for consideration. It's just a framework, so I will be brief Thanks for y

[gentoo-dev] Re: Signing everything, for fun and for profit

2006-05-20 Thread Peter
On Thu, 18 May 2006 23:45:17 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote: >The problem, in short, is how to handle the checksumming and signing of >gentoo-provided files so that manipulation by external entities becomes >difficult. all snip... PMFJI, but as a user, not a security expert, I had a few thoughts tha

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Signing everything, for fun and for profit

2006-05-19 Thread Lance Albertson
Marius Mauch wrote: > On Fri, 19 May 2006 12:28:04 -0400 > Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Who signs the Manifests? Why are some unsigned? Is there a single >> Gentoo Security Key (like I know Slackware has and some other distros >> to ensure the authenticity of their files)? > > Because th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Signing everything, for fun and for profit

2006-05-19 Thread Marius Mauch
On Fri, 19 May 2006 12:28:04 -0400 Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Who signs the Manifests? Why are some unsigned? Is there a single > Gentoo Security Key (like I know Slackware has and some other distros > to ensure the authenticity of their files)? Because the whole signing stuff isn't offic

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Signing everything, for fun and for profit

2006-05-19 Thread Stephen Bennett
On Fri, 19 May 2006 12:28:04 -0400 Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Who signs the Manifests? The dev who commits it. > Why are some unsigned? Because some devs don't sign Manifests. > Is there a single > Gentoo Security Key (like I know Slackware has and some other distros > to ensure the au

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Signing everything, for fun and for profit

2006-05-19 Thread Chris Bainbridge
On 19/05/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Who signs the Manifests? Why are some unsigned? Is there a single Gentoo Security Key (like I know Slackware has and some other distros to ensure the authenticity of their files)? Individual developers sign the manifests with their own gpg keys. Som

[gentoo-dev] Re: Signing everything, for fun and for profit

2006-05-19 Thread Peter
On Thu, 18 May 2006 23:45:17 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote: > Hello all, snip... I have a question about package Manifests. On reviewing portage, some Manifests are signed by various GPG keys, and others are not signed at all! I submitted something to Patrick off list (largely because I'm not a de