"C. Bergström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > On 17-09-2008 10:41:07 +0200, "C. Bergström" wrote:
> >>> By the way, I'm against this stuff. I rather see a PATH solution
> >>> involved. Portage already has a DEFAULT_PATH, and if someone
> >>> refuses to install patch, one co
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 17-09-2008 10:41:07 +0200, "C. Bergström" wrote:
By the way, I'm against this stuff. I rather see a PATH solution
involved. Portage already has a DEFAULT_PATH, and if someone refuses to
install patch, one could always use a special directory with symlinks to
the g-v
On 17-09-2008 10:41:07 +0200, "C. Bergström" wrote:
>> By the way, I'm against this stuff. I rather see a PATH solution
>> involved. Portage already has a DEFAULT_PATH, and if someone refuses to
>> install patch, one could always use a special directory with symlinks to
>> the g-versions, e.g. pa
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 17-09-2008 10:21:17 +0200, Santiago M. Mola wrote:
Why not simply alias patch=gpatch in profile.bashrc?
See the FreeBSD profile for an example.
I'd like to package portage for OpenSolaris and have it just drop-in work so
modifications like what you suggest
Santiago M. Mola wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 9:59 AM, "C. Bergström"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, C. Bergström wrote:
Here's another idea and I don't know why I didn't think of it
sooner.. Instead of any system change
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 17-09-2008 09:59:42 +0200, "C. Bergström" wrote:
Why not simply alias patch=gpatch in profile.bashrc?
See the FreeBSD profile for an example.
I'd like to package portage for OpenSolaris and have it just drop-in
work so modifications like what you suggest w
On 17-09-2008 10:21:17 +0200, Santiago M. Mola wrote:
> >> Why not simply alias patch=gpatch in profile.bashrc?
> >> See the FreeBSD profile for an example.
> >>
> >
> > I'd like to package portage for OpenSolaris and have it just drop-in work so
> > modifications like what you suggest wouldn't be
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 9:59 AM, "C. Bergström"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, C. Bergström wrote:
>>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Here's another idea and I don't know why I didn't think of it
>>> sooner.. Instead of any system change to the patch ebuild.. Ins
On 17-09-2008 09:59:42 +0200, "C. Bergström" wrote:
>> Why not simply alias patch=gpatch in profile.bashrc?
>> See the FreeBSD profile for an example.
>>
> I'd like to package portage for OpenSolaris and have it just drop-in
> work so modifications like what you suggest wouldn't be required.
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, C. Bergström wrote:
Here's another idea and I don't know why I didn't think of it
sooner.. Instead of any system change to the patch ebuild.. Inside
the eutils.eclass do a quick check for gpatch and if it exists use
that vs patch.
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, C. Bergström wrote:
> Here's another idea and I don't know why I didn't think of it
> sooner.. Instead of any system change to the patch ebuild.. Inside
> the eutils.eclass do a quick check for gpatch and if it exists use
> that vs patch.
Why not simply alias patch=gpat
Duncan wrote:
"C. Bergström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 16 Sep 2008
22:30:51 +0200:
1) Add a symlink in GNU patch ebuild to symlink patch to gpatch
You mean the other way, right? gpatch -> patch , since we already have
patch, and need gpa
"C. Bergström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 16 Sep 2008
22:30:51 +0200:
> 1) Add a symlink in GNU patch ebuild to symlink patch to gpatch
You mean the other way, right? gpatch -> patch , since we already have
patch, and need gpatch if the below is to w
13 matches
Mail list logo
