On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, some of you might still remember what I said about gtk and
> slots long time ago. Just to summarize my point:
>
> * the use of slots should be MINIMIZED. IMHO, the kernel is one
> of the few valid uses, gtk is NOT
* Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Le lundi 30 juin 2008 à 19:01 +0200, Enrico Weigelt a écrit :
> >
> >
> > Funny, how you all manage to make simple things complicated ;-o
> >
> > I guess nobody considered an trivial solutions like an useflag ...
>
> no, this is not the pro
Le lundi 30 juin 2008 à 19:01 +0200, Enrico Weigelt a écrit :
>
>
> Funny, how you all manage to make simple things complicated ;-o
>
> I guess nobody considered an trivial solutions like an useflag ...
no, this is not the proper solution. Just consider how bad gtk/gtk2
useflag was and that was
Funny, how you all manage to make simple things complicated ;-o
I guess nobody considered an trivial solutions like an useflag ...
cu
--
-
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
-
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:41:17 +0200
Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > := only makes sense when something is both a DEPEND and an RDEPEND.
> > Actual behaviour, for Paludis, is that it rewrites := deps to :=blah
> > when writing to VDB any time it can, and leaves anything it can't
> > as
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:57:11 +0200
> Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I miss two things here:
>> a) What happens in case of DEPEND="", RDEPEND=">=cat/bar-2:=" ? Is
>> that defined? If yes, what does it mean? If not, what shall be the
>> package managers behavio
Tiziano Müller schrieb:
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
Tiziano Müller schrieb:
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
Tiziano Müller schrieb:
Hi everyone
I'd like to bring bug #229521 to your attention and see whether we can
come up with a solution for it.
The problem:
A package "foo" depends on a slotted pa
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
> Tiziano Müller schrieb:
>> Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
>>
>>> Tiziano Müller schrieb:
Hi everyone
I'd like to bring bug #229521 to your attention and see whether we can
come up with a solution for it.
The problem:
A package "foo" depends
