RE: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Changes to the way Java packages are built

2006-06-19 Thread Bob Young
> Some here don't care. That's fine -- for them. It's a bit bigger > than that for me, but they don't ask me to run what is to me slaveryware, > and I won't ask them to give up what is to them "convenienceware". > I certaintly support your right to choose such a standard for yourself, however

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Changes to the way Java packages are built

2006-06-19 Thread Duncan
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 18 Jun 2006 13:32:58 -0400: > May I ask, because I'm very confused, wtf is freedomware? > > I can only assume you mean oss/free java? As distinct from "freeware", and also known as Free or Libre Software, libre b

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Changes to the way Java packages are built

2006-06-19 Thread Duncan
Joshua Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 18 Jun 2006 12:46:37 -0500: > That being said... one of our users has been working on using GCJ to > this end: > > https://projects.gentooexperimental.org/expj/wiki/GCJ_as_a_JDK Thanks. > As for why this hasn