Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New lists and their usage

2007-07-23 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 22:20 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: > On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 13:41 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 21:26 +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote: > > > Ryan Hill wrote: > > > > zombieswift/new devs-project > > > > council/trustee nominations

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New lists and their usage

2007-07-23 Thread George Prowse
Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 21:26 +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote: Ryan Hill wrote: zombieswift/new devs-project council/trustee nominations -project Then it's worth cross-posting -core or -dev-announce or similar. I thought that goal of -project was

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New lists and their usage

2007-07-23 Thread Roy Marples
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 13:41 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 21:26 +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote: > > Ryan Hill wrote: > > > zombieswift/new devs -project > > > council/trustee nominations -project > > > > Then it's worth cross-posting -core or -

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New lists and their usage

2007-07-23 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 20:33 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:26:07 +0200 > Jan Kundrát <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ryan Hill wrote: > > > zombieswift/new devs -project > > > council/trustee nominations -project > > > > Then it's worth cro

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New lists and their usage

2007-07-23 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 21:26 +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote: > Ryan Hill wrote: > > zombieswift/new devs-project > > council/trustee nominations -project > > Then it's worth cross-posting -core or -dev-announce or similar. I > thought that goal of -project was to keep devs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New lists and their usage

2007-07-23 Thread Joe Peterson
Duncan wrote: > The idea is this. For non-tech posts, X-post the /first/ post, the > announcement of the idea (for new devs, nominations, etc, to both dev and > dev-announce), so those only paying attention to dev know about it. Set > the followup to project (not dev). Those who wish to discu

[gentoo-dev] Re: New lists and their usage

2007-07-23 Thread Duncan
Richard Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:32:26 -0400: > Jan Kundrát wrote: >> Ryan Hill wrote: >>> zombieswift/new devs-project >>> council/trustee nominations -project >> >> Then it's worth cross-posting -core

[gentoo-dev] Re: New lists and their usage

2007-07-22 Thread Ryan Hill
Jan Kundrát wrote: > Then it's worth cross-posting -core or -dev-announce or similar. I > thought that goal of -project was to keep devs away from poisonous > content without impairing their Gentoo-awareness. I'd like to think that the goal of -project is to let devs who are only interested in te

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New lists and their usage

2007-07-22 Thread Richard Freeman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jan Kundrát wrote: > Ryan Hill wrote: >> zombieswift/new devs -project >> council/trustee nominations -project > > Then it's worth cross-posting -core or -dev-announce or similar. I > thought that goal of -project was to keep

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New lists and their usage

2007-07-22 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:26:07 +0200 Jan Kundrát <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ryan Hill wrote: > > zombieswift/new devs-project > > council/trustee nominations -project > > Then it's worth cross-posting -core or -dev-announce or similar. I > thought that goal of -proj

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New lists and their usage

2007-07-22 Thread Jan Kundrát
Ryan Hill wrote: > zombieswift/new devs -project > council/trustee nominations -project Then it's worth cross-posting -core or -dev-announce or similar. I thought that goal of -project was to keep devs away from poisonous content without impairing their Gentoo-awareness.

[gentoo-dev] Re: New lists and their usage

2007-07-22 Thread Ryan Hill
Chris Gianelloni wrote: > gentoo-dev: This list is for technical discussion, primarily between > developers, about development and development-related issues that > directly affect the tree or current projects. For now, no changes are > made to this list. technical discussion > gentoo-projects:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New lists and their usage

2007-07-22 Thread Denis Dupeyron
On 7/21/07, Nathan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From what I can tell by reading the logs of the council meeting [1], the purpose of -project is to keep "all the flamewars and bitching" off the -dev list. On 7/21/07, Richard Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think this is a good idea. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New lists and their usage

2007-07-21 Thread Richard Freeman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duncan wrote: > Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted >> gentoo-projects: This list is for... what exactly? I've not really >> figured that one out just yet. I know it is supposed to be pretty much >> anything that doesn't fit into gentoo-dev o

[gentoo-dev] Re: New lists and their usage

2007-07-20 Thread Duncan
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:20:24 -0700: > gentoo-dev: This list is for technical discussion, primarily between > developers, about development and development-related issues that > directly affect the tree or current proj

[gentoo-dev] Re: New lists and their usage

2007-07-20 Thread Duncan
"Nathan Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:53:02 -0700: > On 7/20/07, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> gentoo-projects: This list is for... what exactly? I've not really >> figured that one out just yet. I know it is sup