On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 19:59 +0100, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> GLEP46, as discussed on Januar 21-24.
> I'd say it's ready. The only minor thing is where to keep the list of
> available tags. As far as I understood neysx we should keep it in
> metadata.dtd itself.
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/gle
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
> the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
> (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
>
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> vote on, let us know ! Simply r
On Monday 05 February 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 01:06 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Reply-to
>
> I've already completed this, I just haven't figured out exactly where it
> needs to be committed. I'm guessing somewhere in the developer
> handbook. Anyway, where should I s
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 01:06 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Reply-to
I've already completed this, I just haven't figured out exactly where it
needs to be committed. I'm guessing somewhere in the developer
handbook. Anyway, where should I send this so it'll be done? File a
bug?
--
Chris Gianelloni
R
On Monday 05 February 2007, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Reply-to and SPF docs? Isn't this the third month now?
I might be counting wrong, as last time I wasn't there, but it might be the
fourth, counting the original one.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
Gentoo/Al
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
> 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
> irc.freenode.net) !
Reply-to and SPF docs? Isn't this the third month now?
Also the infra doc on dev email still says not to use d.g.o
On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 14:04:49 -0600
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> >> It would but having some kind of deadline after which you are for
> >> example free to take over the package if you want to would be nice.
> >
> > That's going too far; there's certainly no need t
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
>> It would but having some kind of deadline after which you are for
>> example free to take over the package if you want to would be nice.
>
> That's going too far; there's certainly no need to take over a package
> just to get a fix in. If you want to take over a package,
