On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 09:37 -0600, Joshua Baergen wrote:
> Rémi Cardona wrote:
> > Markus Ullmann wrote:
> >>> Because it looks like the 2.x intel driver might still need this type of
> >>> hack to work properly for some types of machines (my laptop being a good
> >>> example of this...)
> >> Also
Joshua Baergen wrote:
> I don't think that Xinerama is really supported anymore. It's not
> really needed, depending on what you're trying to do - Xrandr 1.2 should
> handle most general/common use cases.
Either way, it doesn't work as advertised :
- xinerama segfaults xorg-server
- I couldn't
Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Markus Ullmann wrote:
>>> Because it looks like the 2.x intel driver might still need this type of
>>> hack to work properly for some types of machines (my laptop being a good
>>> example of this...)
>> Also 2.x breaks on my notebook when using xinerama and dual monitor atm
>>
Markus Ullmann wrote:
>> Because it looks like the 2.x intel driver might still need this type of
>> hack to work properly for some types of machines (my laptop being a good
>> example of this...)
>
> Also 2.x breaks on my notebook when using xinerama and dual monitor atm
> so nothing rock solid y
> Because it looks like the 2.x intel driver might still need this type of
> hack to work properly for some types of machines (my laptop being a good
> example of this...)
Also 2.x breaks on my notebook when using xinerama and dual monitor atm
so nothing rock solid yet ;)
Greetz
-Jokey
--
[EMAI
