Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-21 Thread Andrew Muraco
Mint Shows wrote: This feature should only be used for things that are directly related to the tree, and will cause mass breakage if ignored. I fully agree with this statement. I am behind the adoption of the GLEP only if it does what (I originally believed) was its purpose...to g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-21 Thread Mint Shows
This feature should only be used for things that are directly related to the tree, and will cause mass breakage if ignored.I fully agree with this statement.  I am behind the adoption of the GLEP only if it does what (I originally believed) was its purpose...to get CRITICAL news regarding package u

[gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-20 Thread Dan Meltzer
Personally, I do not think the tree is the place for anything besides that which relates to the tree. I really do not think users would appreciate there sync being burdoned by "Developer x broke his toe this week" ; "developer y is going to italy" ; "We recently recieved 3 new mirrors" and have al

[gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-18 Thread Duncan
George Prowse posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Sat, 19 Nov 2005 01:44:31 +: > Having organised several Gentoo UK meetings I would like to be advised if > anyone has a problem; especially if they dont come or have no idea when, > where or what they are. Top posting lost the con

[gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-13 Thread Duncan
Chris Gianelloni posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:26:08 -0500: >> I hope that the technical solution will allow users to choose to see >> news about packages that are not installed - so that we can deliver news >> that isn't strictly package related, such as new

[gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-12 Thread R Hill
Dan Meltzer wrote: Forever. How about, "as long as relevant"? ;) --de. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-12 Thread R Hill
Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 21:33 +, Stuart Herbert wrote: Hence emerge --news. Why? There's no "emerge --etc" or "emerge --etc-update" functionality. Why must it be "emerge --news" at all? # emerge --help config probably an emerge --help news that explains the basic

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-12 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 04:32 -0700, Duncan wrote: > I agree to some extent with both viewpoints, here. I think the viewpoint > of the "portage first" side is that we already have the "traditional" > stuff, the announce and dev list, the GWN, the forums, and "system > changing" announcements general

[gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-12 Thread Duncan
Grobian posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Sat, 12 Nov 2005 09:49:11 +0100: > Stuart Herbert wrote: >> I thought I'd been very clear in the email that you've replied to that I >> support making the news available via other ways. It's the timing that >> I'm a bit worried about. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-11 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 11/11/2005-05:48:50(-0700): Duncan types > Perhaps $PORTDIR/news, with seen and unseen subdirs (and appropriate > no-sync settings on the subdirs) Remember that $PORTDIR can be shared between machines. That's why "world" is kept in /var/lib/portage. -- \Georgi Georgiev \ Ignoranc

[gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-11 Thread Duncan
Grant Goodyear posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:09:58 -0600: > I was going to say that the only way new news items could appear is > during an emerge --sync, but of course that's not true for people who > either add an overlay or use CVS. I'd be comfortable wit

[gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-11 Thread Duncan
Benno Schulenberg posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:28:17 +0100: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> Next draft will propose being able to append .read to a filename >> to mark it read without deleting it. > > But don't use ".read", as it can be understood as both prese

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-06 Thread John Myers
On Sunday 06 November 2005 13:38, Duncan wrote: > I don't believe the apache upgrade issues were announced on the announce > list. For the record, it was sent to the announce list on 2004-12-24. Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [gentoo-announce] Apache packages refresh on 8th January 20

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-06 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:38:47 -0700 Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | While I agree with the point you make, I don't believe the apache | upgrade issues were announced on the announce list. The news in the | tree thing is a good idea, IMO, but it'll take some time to | implement. "Earth changing

[gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-06 Thread Duncan
Stuart Herbert posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:37:14 +: > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 13:58 +0100, Grobian wrote: >> A lot Gentoo users I know read gentoo-announce and the GWN. > > But *many* more don't. That's what we learned from the Apache package > refresh,