Ryan Hill wrote:
> Just an update - I've finished most major desktop stuff for x86 without any
> problems. I'm moving onto stuff that's already on the tracker and is fixed in
> testing but not stable. Rather than open and track a ton of new bugs, I'd
> like
> to reopen the original ~arch bugs a
(apologies in advance if this goes through twice)
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 12:18 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
>> Should arch testers start working with 4.1.1 then? And do you want bugs to
>> block #117482?
> Arch testers should contact their architecture's leads or Release
>
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 12:18 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
>> Should arch testers start working with 4.1.1 then? And do you want bugs to
>> block #117482?
> Arch testers should contact their architecture's leads or Release
> Engineering Architecture Coordinator. As for bug re
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 12:18 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > OK, guys, I was speaking with vapier earlier about the possibility of
> > getting gcc 4.1.1 stable for the 2006.1 release. We've managed to build
> > some release media with it, and are planning on doing more testing
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> OK, guys, I was speaking with vapier earlier about the possibility of
> getting gcc 4.1.1 stable for the 2006.1 release. We've managed to build
> some release media with it, and are planning on doing more testing with
> it. What we really need is for more people to test
