[gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay

2009-08-22 Thread Torsten Veller
* Sebastian Pipping : > - perl-experimental | * Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - 0.100091 (Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework) Old version. Was replaced by up-to-date stuff. | * Date-Manip - 5.54 (Date manipulation routines) _Date-Manip_ is in the tree as DateMan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay

2009-08-22 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > And I was under the impression that pure-funtoo > falls under this category: providing packages that don't exist in portage. If you want to you can adjust funtoo-ripper to do just that on your local machine. All you have to do is adjust the EbuildTree._minus funct

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay

2009-08-22 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > I use overlays for packages I can't get through portage. If they > conflict, I don't use them. Why do you apply such a general rule? For instance I have been using dev-util/diffuse from the zugaina overlay until a newer version went into the gentoo tree. Portage tell

[gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay

2009-08-22 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 08/22/2009 05:56 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: Sebastian Pipping wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Uhm, I just discovered that there are conflicts with portage too. That is not good. After I added pure-funtoo, it messed up my emerge -u world (stuff like wanting to upgrade to sys-apps/baselayout-2.1.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay

2009-08-22 Thread Jeremy Olexa
Sebastian Pipping wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Uhm, I just discovered that there are conflicts with portage too. That is not good. After I added pure-funtoo, it messed up my emerge -u world (stuff like wanting to upgrade to sys-apps/baselayout-2.1.5). Hopefully fixed http://git.goodpoint.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay

2009-08-22 Thread Jeremy Olexa
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Of course that's my personal opinion. I don't use "developer/experimental" overlays, I only use those who provide some extra packages I want. And I was under the impression that pure-funtoo falls under this category: providing packages that don't exist in portage.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay

2009-08-22 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 08/22/2009 04:27 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 08/22/2009 06:40 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Huh? This is true of all overlays. Not the ones I'm using. Have you ever used the X11, GNOME

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay

2009-08-22 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 08/22/2009 06:40 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: >> Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> Huh? This is true of all overlays. > > Not the ones I'm using. Have you ever used the X11, GNOME or KDE teams overlays? Most of the overlays around

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay

2009-08-22 Thread Thomas Sachau
Sebastian Pipping schrieb: > Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> There seems to be a bit of (minimal) duplication between pure-funtoo and >> sunrise: >> >> app-office/thinking-rock-bin >> dev-tex/mimetex >> x11-drivers/xf86-video-nouveau >> >> And since sunrise is the most popular overlay, it might b

[gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay

2009-08-22 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 08/22/2009 06:40 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 08/22/2009 05:59 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 08/22/2009 05:39 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: Sebastian Pipping wrote: Commits are done automatically, triggering and pushing is manual at the moment. By now a cron-based

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay

2009-08-21 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > Uhm, I just discovered that there are conflicts with portage too. That > is not good. After I added pure-funtoo, it messed up my emerge -u world > (stuff like wanting to upgrade to sys-apps/baselayout-2.1.5). Hopefully fixed http://git.goodpoint.de/?p=pure-funtoo.git;a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay

2009-08-21 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > There seems to be a bit of (minimal) duplication between pure-funtoo and > sunrise: > > app-office/thinking-rock-bin > dev-tex/mimetex > x11-drivers/xf86-video-nouveau > > And since sunrise is the most popular overlay, it might be a good idea > to also omit packag

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay

2009-08-21 Thread Jeremy Olexa
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 08/22/2009 05:59 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 08/22/2009 05:39 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: Sebastian Pipping wrote: Commits are done automatically, triggering and pushing is manual at the moment. By now a cron-based setup is running syncing the pure-funtoo ove

[gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay

2009-08-21 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 08/22/2009 05:59 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 08/22/2009 05:39 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: Sebastian Pipping wrote: Commits are done automatically, triggering and pushing is manual at the moment. By now a cron-based setup is running syncing the pure-funtoo overlay (and therefore also i

[gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay

2009-08-21 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 08/22/2009 05:39 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: Sebastian Pipping wrote: Commits are done automatically, triggering and pushing is manual at the moment. By now a cron-based setup is running syncing the pure-funtoo overlay (and therefore also its atom and rss feeds) every 24 hours. There see