[gentoo-dev] Re: DB vs SCM (was Re: [RFC] Some sync control)

2007-01-29 Thread Steve Long
Petteri Räty wrote: >> Please note, I'm not talking about applications like portage or pkgcore, >> just the ebuild text files, which I understand have one maintainer? > > Many ebuilds are in maintained by a bunch of people via herds. > That's not really an issue for a db app. >> I appreciate that

[gentoo-dev] Re: DB vs SCM (was Re: [RFC] Some sync control)

2007-01-29 Thread Steve Long
Marius Mauch wrote: >> I'm a bit confused about all the portage tree stuff. There's just >> under 25,000 ebuilds, which are maintained by about 100 devs (not >> sure of exact number, taken from a forum post.) I guess what I'm >> asking is why this isn't just a database. > > Please define "database

[gentoo-dev] Re: DB vs SCM (was Re: [RFC] Some sync control)

2007-01-29 Thread Steve Long
Donnie Berkholz wrote: > The idea of restricting access to specific parts of gentoo-x86 has come > up many times. It doesn't fix anything and actually makes some things > worse. Committers still have access to wherever they can commit, so they > can work whatever evil they want there without needin