Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
> I'd say Ciaran has to have write access to any such repository,
> as one of the main contributors.
>
Face it, he's never going to get write access to gentoo infra. The best
gentoo can give him is access via spb, who has made it clear he'll simply
be pulling in wh
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:43:51 +0200
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [16:49] infra won't give any access to non-devs that needs
> SSH keys.
>
> Isn't that hard to find I'd say?
That's not a reason for moving. That's a reason for not using infra.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Descrip
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 07:20:46PM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> > If someone can provide a good reason for changing to a system that's
> > more work, I'll change. If there isn't a good reason, I won't.
>
> Maybe if you actually read the council log, you'd see the reason?
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:20:46 +0200
> Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
>>> If someone can provide a good reason for changing to a system that's
>>> more work, I'll change. If there isn't a good reason, I won't.
>> Maybe if you actually r
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:20:46 +0200
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> > If someone can provide a good reason for changing to a system that's
> > more work, I'll change. If there isn't a good reason, I won't.
>
> Maybe if you actually read the council log, you'd see
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> If someone can provide a good reason for changing to a system that's
> more work, I'll change. If there isn't a good reason, I won't.
Maybe if you actually read the council log, you'd see the reason? yeah,
it's indeed there, believe me.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:58:52 +0100
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> PMS:
> >> - should be up and running on Gentoo infra by next meeting
> >
> > What is the justification for making this change? It's already
> > incon
