Richard Freeman schrieb:
> Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
>>
>> Wouldn't it make much more sense to package move ksudoku then?
>>
>
> I was thinking the same thing - this is a stable package, so ideally it
> shouldn't be "replaced" with an unstable one. Why not keep -0.4 in the
> tree for stable users?
Richard Freeman wrote:
> Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
>>
>> Wouldn't it make much more sense to package move ksudoku then?
>>
>
> I was thinking the same thing - this is a stable package, so ideally it
> shouldn't be "replaced" with an unstable one. Why not keep -0.4 in the
> tree for stable users?
+
Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
Wouldn't it make much more sense to package move ksudoku then?
I was thinking the same thing - this is a stable package, so ideally it
shouldn't be "replaced" with an unstable one. Why not keep -0.4 in the
tree for stable users?
Markus Ullmann wrote:
> +# Markus Ullmann (31 Jan 2009)
> +# Mask for removal in 30 days (found its way into mainline kde as
> kde-base/ksudoku)
> +games-puzzle/ksudoku
> +
>
Wouldn't it make much more sense to package move ksudoku then?
Tobias
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digit
