Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] base.eclass

2010-01-03 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 11:28:27AM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, Harald van Dijk wrote: > > >> > 65 base_src_util $@ > >> This is not problem > > > Only because you can be sure there will be exactly one word in the > > result, which will not be split. In

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] base.eclass

2010-01-03 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, Harald van Dijk wrote: >> > 65 base_src_util $@ >> This is not problem > Only because you can be sure there will be exactly one word in the > result, which will not be split. In general, $@ should be quoted, and it > would be a good idea to either do it he

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] base.eclass

2010-01-03 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 02:56:01AM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Dne 3.1.2010 01:56, Mark Bateman napsal(a): > > There seems to be alot of unquoted variables > > > > 65 base_src_util $@ > This is not problem Only because you can be sure there will be exactly one word in the result

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] base.eclass

2010-01-02 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 3.1.2010 01:56, Mark Bateman napsal(a): > There seems to be alot of unquoted variables > > 65 base_src_util $@ This is not problem > > 90 case $1 in Yarp this is problem and fixed > > 95

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] base.eclass

2010-01-02 Thread Mark Bateman
Tomáš Chvátal gentoo.org> writes: > > Hola, > I have incorporated all fixes to base.eclass that has been itching me > for a while (closes both open bugs). > > Whats new: > * base_src_install docs > this thingie install docs and html_docs from bash array defined in > global scope (or anywhere el