Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 'mad' vs 'mp3' USE flags

2006-07-15 Thread Alec Warner
Duncan wrote: > Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], > excerpted below, on Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:24:26 -0700: > >>> Per-package use.mask is not here for another year and in the mean time I >>> needed a working solution, this is it. >> It think we can have it sooner than "another

[gentoo-dev] Re: 'mad' vs 'mp3' USE flags

2006-07-15 Thread Duncan
Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:24:26 -0700: >> Per-package use.mask is not here for another year and in the mean time I >> needed a working solution, this is it. > > It think we can have it sooner than "another year". There are l

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 'mad' vs 'mp3' USE flags

2006-07-14 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:49:47 +0100 Daniel Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:43:54 -0400 Chris Gianelloni | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > | If the package only uses libmad, and libmad doesn't work on | > | $platform, then why not simply disable

[gentoo-dev] Re: 'mad' vs 'mp3' USE flags

2006-07-14 Thread Daniel Watkins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:43:54 -0400 Chris Gianelloni > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | If the package only uses libmad, and libmad doesn't work on $platform, > | then why not simply disable mp3 support on that platform until libm