On Wednesday 20 December 2006 14:27, Alin Năstac wrote:
> But dev-util/nsis installs a native application - makensis - which
> creates win32 setups. I think this excludes nsis from your list.
right, i would be OK with this living on ... last i checked, it didnt have a
native linux port, but it se
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> none of this belongs in the tree as we do not have a windows port
>
But dev-util/nsis installs a native application - makensis - which
creates win32 setups. I think this excludes nsis from your list.
I find it useful because I can automatize updates of my win32 setups on
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 13:09, Alin Năstac wrote:
> What is your motivation ?
people want to populate the tree with packages that have no value in a pure
linux system ... they want to stick ebuilds in that produce only win32
binaries (like wx-mingw)
i've also seen requests for ebuilds tha
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 December 2006 03:59, Alin Năstac wrote:
>
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>>> why do you feel the need to label crap as "official" ?
>>>
>> Because I consider it should be maintained by Gentoo devs.
>>
>
> as i said, that's up to you and other
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 00:36 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 December 2006 00:12, Mike Doty wrote:
> > I wasn't aware we had any. can you provide a list?
>
> there are bugs opened from time to time with people requesting more, but we
> have these now:
> dev-libs/wx-xmingw
> dev-lib
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 03:59, Alin Năstac wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > why do you feel the need to label crap as "official" ?
>
> Because I consider it should be maintained by Gentoo devs.
as i said, that's up to you and other devs to decide ... it's location doesnt
matter; if you ca
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> having ebuilds in the tree that only work when you have a mingw compiler
> annoy
> me greatly as their only purpose is to produce windows binaries ... aka,
> things that are useless to a linux host
>
> however, i think it's a lovely idea to open a mingw overlay and popul
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> why do you feel the need to label crap as "official" ?
Because I consider it should be maintained by Gentoo devs.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 03:22, Alin Năstac wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > however, i think it's a lovely idea to open a mingw overlay and populate
> > the sucker until it's stuffed full of crap for people to use
>
> I kinda need dev-util/nsis
another good example of something i dont thin
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> however, i think it's a lovely idea to open a mingw overlay and populate the
> sucker until it's stuffed full of crap for people to use
>
I kinda need dev-util/nsis, but moving mingw stuff to an overlay would
be fine by me as long as the overlay is *official*.
signat
On 12/20/06, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
if we want to punt the toolchain packages as well (but i dont have a problem
with these being in tree):
dev-util/mingw-runtime
dev-util/w32api
-mike
Hello,
Please leave the toolchain so cross-compilation to win32 will be
available as mains
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 00:12, Mike Doty wrote:
> I wasn't aware we had any. can you provide a list?
there are bugs opened from time to time with people requesting more, but we
have these now:
dev-libs/wx-xmingw
dev-libs/wxactivex
if we want to punt the toolchain packages as well (but i d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> having ebuilds in the tree that only work when you have a mingw compiler
> annoy
> me greatly as their only purpose is to produce windows binaries ... aka,
> things that are useless to a linux host
>
> however, i think it's
having ebuilds in the tree that only work when you have a mingw compiler annoy
me greatly as their only purpose is to produce windows binaries ... aka,
things that are useless to a linux host
however, i think it's a lovely idea to open a mingw overlay and populate the
sucker until it's stuffed
14 matches
Mail list logo
