Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] multilib-build.eclass and restricting unsupported ABIs

2013-03-03 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:41:07 +0100 Alexis Ballier wrote: > I'd prefer the useflag names for the sake of unicity, but I'm not sure > I understand why and how multilib-portage needs it. Well, I mostly thought that if we were to introduce that information, multilib-portage could use it as well rathe

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] multilib-build.eclass and restricting unsupported ABIs

2013-03-03 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 00:02:30 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > With the introduction of support for x32 ABI it has become necessary > to enhance the multilib-build eclass with some kind of support for > specifying the supported/unsupported ABIs. > > In this particular context, tetromino has

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] multilib-build.eclass and restricting unsupported ABIs

2013-03-02 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, With the introduction of support for x32 ABI it has become necessary to enhance the multilib-build eclass with some kind of support for specifying the supported/unsupported ABIs. In this particular context, tetromino has noted that many packages don't support the x32 ABI. From the ones cur