On nie, 2017-06-11 at 18:18 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 00:30:07 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Hi, everyone.
> >
> > As you may or may not know, PMS says rather little about REQUIRED_USE
> > [1,2]. The largest past of the definition is shared with other
> > dependency-
On sob, 2017-06-10 at 00:30 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Below I have listed the clauses I'd like to ban in a few logical groups,
> along with explanations and examples.
>
> [...]
Actually, after some thinking, here's one more:
4. All-of operator inside ||
While thi
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 00:30:07 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> As you may or may not know, PMS says rather little about REQUIRED_USE
> [1,2]. The largest past of the definition is shared with other
> dependency-like specifications [3].
>
> Similarly to regular dependency specificati
Hi, everyone.
As you may or may not know, PMS says rather little about REQUIRED_USE
[1,2]. The largest past of the definition is shared with other
dependency-like specifications [3].
Similarly to regular dependency specifications, PMS is rather lax in
nesting things. While this isn't a major prob
