On Friday 16 September 2005 17:42, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> If we'll find other functions needed for portability's sake, they'll
> probably going to be there, too.
Dropped the symcmd function, cleaned up the treecopy function (Martin, take a
look at cp --parent, what treecopy does is jus
On Friday 16 September 2005 01:36 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Friday 16 September 2005 19:28, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > current stable does yes, but ive started adding customizable compression
> > to trunk
>
> Okay, then *that* is a problem :P Suggestion how to fix it?
simple, dont a
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Friday 16 September 2005 19:28, Mike Frysinger wrote:
current stable does yes, but ive started adding customizable compression to
trunk
Okay, then *that* is a problem :P Suggestion how to fix it?
You are going to have to ask portage what it used via a Po
On Friday 16 September 2005 19:28, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> current stable does yes, but ive started adding customizable compression to
> trunk
Okay, then *that* is a problem :P Suggestion how to fix it?
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
(Gentoo/Free
On Friday 16 September 2005 12:33 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Friday 16 September 2005 17:59, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i dont see this being really useful ... either way, assuming the manpage
> > is compressed with gzip (or compressed at all) is wrong
>
> Doesn't portage always gzip
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 18:33 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Friday 16 September 2005 17:59, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i dont see this being really useful ... either way, assuming the manpage is
> > compressed with gzip (or compressed at all) is wrong
> Doesn't portage always gzip manpa
On Friday 16 September 2005 18:16, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> I do not think its so urgent? Either way, we have elibs approved now,
> so how about waiting a while so that we do not have yet another elib
> candidate to port?
There are at least two ebuilds in portage that uses cp --parente . It wasn'
On Friday 16 September 2005 17:59, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i dont see this being really useful ... either way, assuming the manpage is
> compressed with gzip (or compressed at all) is wrong
Doesn't portage always gzip manpages?
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 17:42 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> If nobody finds problem in the attached eclass, I'm going to commit this
> tonight or tomorrow.
> The first function is a drop-in replacement for cp --parent (that doesn't
> work
> on BSD userland), the second one is a commodi
On Friday 16 September 2005 11:42 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> the second one is a commodity function to symlink
> commands and manpages at once (as done by bsdtar and other packages).
i dont see this being really useful ... either way, assuming the manpage is
compressed with gzip (or c
If nobody finds problem in the attached eclass, I'm going to commit this
tonight or tomorrow.
The first function is a drop-in replacement for cp --parent (that doesn't work
on BSD userland), the second one is a commodity function to symlink commands
and manpages at once (as done by bsdtar and ot
11 matches
Mail list logo
