Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Adding potentially questionable license AcePerl-Indemnity

2020-05-06 Thread Kent Fredric
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:32:41 +1200 Kent Fredric wrote: Ugh. I just discovered this approach is in use in multiple packages. https://metacpan.org/source/LDS/AcePerl-1.92/DISCLAIMER.txt https://metacpan.org/source/LDS/Bio-SamTools-1.00/DISCLAIMER https://metacpan.org/source/AVULLO/Bio-DB-HTS-3.01

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Adding potentially questionable license AcePerl-Indemnity

2020-04-22 Thread Michał Górny
On Thu, 2020-04-23 at 10:32 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: > I've just discovered dev-perl/Ace has some fun questionable licensing > which includes a lovely indemnity clause, which had previously gone > unnoticed, and it stipulates additional requests for research > publications, which is not something

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Adding potentially questionable license AcePerl-Indemnity

2020-04-22 Thread Kent Fredric
I've just discovered dev-perl/Ace has some fun questionable licensing which includes a lovely indemnity clause, which had previously gone unnoticed, and it stipulates additional requests for research publications, which is not something mentioned in any license currently in tree other than Tinker