Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2006-02-10 Thread Marius Mauch
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:27:56 +0100 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:04:53 +0100 > Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support: > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html > > > > This will NOT

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2006-01-23 Thread Marius Mauch
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:04:53 +0100 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html > > This will NOT be voted upon the next council meeting on thursday ;) Ok, made a few minor corrections, main

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2005-12-17 Thread Daniel
> As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html I like it - well done Marius. -- Daniel Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Crypto/PPC/dev-embedded/Forensics/NetMon pgpD3JojbdJir.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2005-12-07 Thread Marius Mauch
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 16:15:49 +0100 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 07 December 2005 04:04, Marius Mauch wrote: > > As stated in the GLEP, gpg is outside the scope of this. As for the > > questions, per entry sigs would invert one of the main goals (size > > reduction). And

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2005-12-07 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 04:04, Marius Mauch wrote: > As stated in the GLEP, gpg is outside the scope of this. As for the > questions, per entry sigs would invert one of the main goals (size > reduction). And so far I haven't seen any sufficient answer to > questions I raised on -core and -por

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2005-12-06 Thread Jon Portnoy
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 01:39:03PM -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote: > Marius Mauch wrote: [Tue Dec 06 2005, 10:04:53AM CST] > > As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support: > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html > > You know, I'd actually support a rather more abrupt transition, > w

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2005-12-06 Thread Marius Mauch
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:39:10 -0500 Olivier Crete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-06-12 at 17:04 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > > As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support: > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html > > I see nothing about GPG in the GLEP.. Would those man

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2005-12-06 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 06:39:10PM -0500, Olivier Crete wrote: > On Tue, 2005-06-12 at 17:04 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > > As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support: > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html > > I see nothing about GPG in the GLEP.. Would those manifest files be

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2005-12-06 Thread Marius Mauch
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 22:58:06 + Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:04:53 +0100 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support: > | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html > > Any reason for SRCURI over SRC_

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2005-12-06 Thread Olivier Crete
On Tue, 2005-06-12 at 17:04 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html I see nothing about GPG in the GLEP.. Would those manifest files be signed like the current ones? Would it be possible to have "per-line" si

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2005-12-06 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 22:58 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:04:53 +0100 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support: > | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html > > Any reason for SRCURI over SRC_URI? 1 less byte?

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2005-12-06 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:04:53 +0100 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support: | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html Any reason for SRCURI over SRC_URI? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2005-12-06 Thread Patrick McLean
You know, I'd actually support a rather more abrupt transition, where we announce that on a particular date all digest files are going to be removed, thereby breaking any version of portage older than portage-x.y.z. Many people would probably miss such a deadline, but assuming that we also public

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2005-12-06 Thread Grant Goodyear
Marius Mauch wrote: [Tue Dec 06 2005, 10:04:53AM CST] > As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html You know, I'd actually support a rather more abrupt transition, where we announce that on a particular date all digest files are going to be

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2005-12-06 Thread Francesco Riosa
Marius Mauch wrote: > Hi, > > As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html > > This will NOT be voted upon the next council meeting on thursday ;) > > Marius > Really great that this has reached us, digest-* files are really annoying from

[gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2005-12-06 Thread Marius Mauch
Hi, As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html This will NOT be voted upon the next council meeting on thursday ;) Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let ther