Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-16 Thread tomjbe
Quoting Thomas Beierlein (2017-08-14 21:58:42) > Bacula ebuilds uses some weird USE flags with mostly negative > logic ('do not build ..') coming from their build system. > > With the actual major release (bacula-9.0.3) we should try to switch to > something more sane. I picked up the new flags fr

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 15/08/17 18:49, tom...@gentoo.org wrote: > I think we can find a proper formulation for the use flag description in > metadata.xml, e.g.: > > director - Installs the backup director additional to the default file daemon. > storage-daemon - Installs the storage daemon additional to the default fi

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread tomjbe
Quoting Rich Freeman (2017-08-15 14:16:14) > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:19 AM, wrote: > > Quoting Michał Górny (2017-08-15 08:43:07) > >> On wto, 2017-08-15 at 06:55 +0200, tom...@gentoo.org wrote: > >> > Quoting Rich Freeman (2017-08-15 00:29:19) > >> > > > >> > > I guess to make it a bit more ex

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 08/15/2017 02:21 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> For example, could you say that a client-only install that still >> installs the X11 components is "minimal?" > > Its somewhat context dependent, for an X application this doesn't > neces

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 08/15/2017 02:21 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > For example, could you say that a client-only install that still > installs the X11 components is "minimal?" Its somewhat context dependent, for an X application this doesn't necessarily constitute additional dependencies for the system (think desktop

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 08/15/2017 11:33 AM, tom...@gentoo.org wrote: >> Quoting Kristian Fiskerstrand (2017-08-15 10:37:39) >>> On 08/15/2017 12:29 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On pon, 2017-08-1

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:19 AM, wrote: > Quoting Michał Górny (2017-08-15 08:43:07) >> On wto, 2017-08-15 at 06:55 +0200, tom...@gentoo.org wrote: >> > Quoting Rich Freeman (2017-08-15 00:29:19) >> > > >> > > I guess to make it a bit more explicit, would it make sense to have 3 >> > > flags: >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 08/15/2017 11:33 AM, tom...@gentoo.org wrote: > Quoting Kristian Fiskerstrand (2017-08-15 10:37:39) >> On 08/15/2017 12:29 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > * 'bacula-clientonly'

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread tomjbe
Quoting Kristian Fiskerstrand (2017-08-15 10:37:39) > On 08/15/2017 12:29 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > >> On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > >>> * 'bacula-clientonly' becomes 'clientonly' > >> This is still negative lo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread tomjbe
Quoting Michał Górny (2017-08-15 08:43:07) > On wto, 2017-08-15 at 06:55 +0200, tom...@gentoo.org wrote: > > Quoting Rich Freeman (2017-08-15 00:29:19) > > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 08/15/2017 12:29 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: >>> * 'bacula-clientonly' becomes 'clientonly' >> This is still negative logic in disguise. clientonly = noserver. Can the "minimum"-use

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-14 Thread Michał Górny
On wto, 2017-08-15 at 06:55 +0200, tom...@gentoo.org wrote: > Quoting Rich Freeman (2017-08-15 00:29:19) > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > > > > > > > > * 'bacula-clientonly' becomes 'clientonly' > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-14 Thread tomjbe
Quoting Rich Freeman (2017-08-15 00:29:19) > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > >> > >> * 'bacula-clientonly' becomes 'clientonly' > > > > This is still negative logic in disguise. clientonly = noserver. True. See

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-14 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: >> >> * 'bacula-clientonly' becomes 'clientonly' > > This is still negative logic in disguise. clientonly = noserver. > >> * 'bacula-nodir' will be replaced by 'director' but with inve

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-14 Thread Michał Górny
On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > Title: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula-9.0.3 > Author: Thomas Beierlein > Content-Type: text/plain > Posted: 2017-08-14 > Revision: 1 > News-Item-Format: 1.0 > Display-If-Installed: > Until now Bacula ebuilds uses the follow

[gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-14 Thread Thomas Beierlein
Bacula ebuilds uses some weird USE flags with mostly negative logic ('do not build ..') coming from their build system. With the actual major release (bacula-9.0.3) we should try to switch to something more sane. I picked up the new flags from app-backup/bareos as both ebuilds have a common anches