[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: media-libs/taglib-extras

2025-01-29 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2025-01-30) # Last release 15 years ago, dead upstream (never imported from kdesvn), # no revdeps probably since amarok last-rites. Removal on 2025-02-27. media-libs/taglib-extras signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] www-client/chromium stabilisation and arch testing

2025-01-28 Thread Matt Jolly
Hi All, Take 2; emailing the affected arch aliases directly only got one response which included a suggestion to take this straight to -dev. As you're probably aware, www-client/chromium is a frequently-updated package with a not-insignificant build. Chromium has an enormous attack surface and i

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-28 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Mittwoch, 1. Jänner 2025 22:50:14 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > Allow me to re-emphasize this topic 4 months later: > [...] One month later and Gentoo ebuild repository is already weighing around 100 Qt5-based ebuilds less than at the beginning of the year. Severa

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: net-misc/qtm

2025-01-28 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2025-01-28) # Last release 8 years ago, dead upstream (repository gone as well), # depends on Qt5, no one else packages this. Removal on 2025-02-27. net-misc/qtm signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: app-misc/qcma

2025-01-28 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2025-01-28) # Last release+commit 7 years ago, dead upstream, unmaintained in Gentoo, # depends on Qt5, broken with >= ffmpeg-5, no one else packages this. # Removal on 2025-02-27. Bug #900947 app-misc/qcma signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: x11-misc/urxvtconfig

2025-01-28 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2025-01-28) # Last release+commit 8 years ago, dead upstream, unmaintained in Gentoo, # depends on Qt5, no one else packages this. Removal on 2025-02-27. x11-misc/urxvtconfig signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-go/get-ego-vendor

2025-01-28 Thread Arthur Zamarin
# Arthur Zamarin (2025-01-28) # Since we are done with EGO_SUM, this tool isn't needed any more. # Removal on 2025-02-27. Bug #948966. dev-go/get-ego-vendor OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: respect MAKEOPTS for `cargo test`

2025-01-28 Thread Arthur Zamarin
On 28/01/2025 14:16, Sam James wrote: > Without this, while (test) compile jobs respect MAKEOPTS via our config > settings > already deployed via the eclass, *test* jobs do not. > > We may want to consider setting NEXTEST_TEST_THREADS and/or having > a cargo_enable_tests helper in the eclass at s

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: media-sound/bempc

2025-01-28 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2025-01-28) # Last release from 14 years ago, dead upstream (repository gone as well). # Plenty of other options in ::gentoo. Bug #947724, removal on 2025-02-27. media-sound/bempc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: respect MAKEOPTS for `cargo test`

2025-01-28 Thread Sam James
Without this, while (test) compile jobs respect MAKEOPTS via our config settings already deployed via the eclass, *test* jobs do not. We may want to consider setting NEXTEST_TEST_THREADS and/or having a cargo_enable_tests helper in the eclass at some point too. Bug: https://github.com/rust-lang/c

[gentoo-dev] User feedback: 2025-xx-yy-dracut-hostonly: new news item

2025-01-26 Thread Nils Freydank
Am Freitag, 24. Januar 2025, 19:44:04 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Nowa Ammerlaan: > Please let me know if the below is clear. To me it's a clear and easy to follow write-up. Besides, while I'm not really affected I really appreciate the hint about a relevant change of defaults here as i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Summer of Code for Gentoo for the year 2025

2025-01-24 Thread Andrey F.
Hey Yury, I'll be interested in contributing again! Hopefully, I'm not too late to the party. I'll drop into IRC again this weekend. On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 12:27 PM Yury German wrote: > > Hey everyone! > > The Google Summer of Code (GSoC) has announced the new application deadline > for organiz

[gentoo-dev] 2025-xx-yy-dracut-hostonly: new news item

2025-01-24 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
To be published whenever the next version of Dracut is released and pushed into ::gentoo. Upstream has changed the default setting for hostonly in the kernel-install hook. I do not expect huge problems, but there might be some weirdness on more unusual systems. I do anticipate some confusion

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-containers/docker-proxy

2025-01-24 Thread Arthur Zamarin
# Arthur Zamarin (2025-01-24) # EAPI=7, uses deprecated Go eclasses, fails to compile, installation # blocked by current versions of docker (which provides the features). # Removal on 2025-02-23. Bugs #948656, #844577, #694898, #678982. app-containers/docker-proxy OpenPGP_signature.asc Descrip

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-metrics/burrow_exporter

2025-01-24 Thread Arthur Zamarin
# Arthur Zamarin (2025-01-24) # EAPI=7, uses depcreated Go eclasses, fails to compile. burrow itself # has exporter built in since version 1.3.4, which can be used instead. # Removal on 2025-02-23. Bugs #948655, #844613, #679086. app-metrics/burrow_exporter OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: O

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-go/go-colortext, dev-go/gom

2025-01-24 Thread Arthur Zamarin
# Arthur Zamarin (2025-01-24) # EAPI=7, uses deprecated Go eclasses, upstream repo is archived. # gom is a go dependency manager which doesn't work with modern # Go tools, and is redundent to standard `go install` commands. # go-colortext has only gom as reverse dependency. # Removal on 2025-02-23

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: app-editors/juffed

2025-01-23 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2025-01-23) # Last release from 12 years ago, git master still defaults to Qt4. # Plenty of other options in ::gentoo. Bug #947741, removal on 2025-02-22. app-editors/juffed signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Re: FYI lists.gentoo.org upcoming migration - COMPLETED

2025-01-23 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 09:54:21PM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Hi everybody, > (please send replies to gentoo-proj...@lists.gentoo.org) > > As an FYI only, what should be a low-impact change, the hosting location > of lists.gentoo.org will be changing. This migration has been completed. --

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: dev-qt/qtbluetooth:5

2025-01-22 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2025-01-23) # CVE-2025-23050, bug #948573; Removal on 2025-02-22. dev-qt/qtbluetooth:5 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: app-text/bibletime

2025-01-22 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2025-01-23) # Unmaintained in Gentoo, last release from 2022 needs Qt5WebEngine. # Bug #926655. Removal on 2025-02-22. app-text/bibletime signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: net-misc/seafile-client, net-misc/seafile, net-libs/libsearpc

2025-01-22 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Montag, 4. Dezember 2023 10:29:33 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Viorel Munteanu wrote: > Packages up for grabs because the proxied maintainer no longer uses > them. [...] > > net-misc/seafile-client > net-misc/seafile > net-libs/libsearpc This is the last call for anyone interested in these pa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-misc/utimer

2025-01-22 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On mercoledì 22 gennaio 2025 13:46:47 Ora standard dell’Europa centrale happysmash27 wrote: > What would be the process for maintaining it to get it in the repositories > again? Hello, please take a look at: http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers Agostino

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-misc/utimer

2025-01-22 Thread happysmash27
I am EXTREMELY reliant on this package (for my alarm every morning) and just now have noticed it broken right as I was about to go to bed (due to continuing to work on a VERY large system update for the new profile version from mid-2024, which has been taking a very very long time due to the lar

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: mono.eclass

2025-01-20 Thread Petr Vaněk
The eclass is no longer used by any package in the tree nor in ::dotnet overlay. Removal in 30 days, on 2025-02-19. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: sys-cluster/k3s

2025-01-19 Thread Zac Medico
# Zac Medico (2025-01-18) # Ebuild is difficult to maintain. No revdeps. # Removal on 2025-02-17. Bug #896044 sys-cluster/k3s OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: A new bugzilla keyword for bug investigation

2025-01-19 Thread Duncan
Sam James posted on Sat, 18 Jan 2025 18:02:58 + as excerpted: > Agostino Sarubbo writes: > >> Good morning everyone, >> >> during tinderbox activity I realized that sometimes there are bugs with >> unknown causes at the time of filing. >> >> Examples are: >> >> - no "error: " string >> >> -

[gentoo-dev] FYI lists.gentoo.org upcoming migration

2025-01-18 Thread Robin H. Johnson
Hi everybody, (please send replies to gentoo-proj...@lists.gentoo.org) As an FYI only, what should be a low-impact change, the hosting location of lists.gentoo.org will be changing. As a first step, the outbound mail routing will be adjusted to go via dev.gentoo.org for that, to ease the transiti

Re: [gentoo-dev] A new bugzilla keyword for bug investigation

2025-01-18 Thread Jonas Stein
For that reason I would like to propose a new bugzilla KEYWORD, like: - NEEDS-TRIAGE or - NEEDS-INVESTIGATION or whatever you think is better. With that KEYWORD we can set-up a saved search and 'experienced' devs can help to diagnose the issue. This KEYWORD is supposed to be set manually and

Re: [gentoo-dev] A new bugzilla keyword for bug investigation

2025-01-18 Thread Sam James
Agostino Sarubbo writes: > Good morning everyone, > > during tinderbox activity I realized that sometimes there are bugs with > unknown causes at the time of filing. > > Examples are: > > - no "error: " string > > - mysterious test failures > > - hidden bugs on build.log but present on config.lo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools.eclass: simplify WANT_AUTOCONF logic

2025-01-18 Thread Sam James
Mike Gilbert writes: > Update WANT_AUTOMAKE atoms to match. > Drop 2.71 from _LATEST_AUTOCONF since 2.72 is stable. > > Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/948125 > Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert > --- LGTM. Thanks. > PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/40187 > > eclass/autotools.eclass | 21 +

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/terminaltables

2025-01-18 Thread Michał Górny
# Michał Górny (2025-01-18) # Superseded by dev-python/terminaltables3, the only revdep switched # over. # Removal on 2025-02-17.  Bug #948333. dev-python/terminaltables -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools.eclass: simplify WANT_AUTOCONF logic

2025-01-17 Thread Mike Gilbert
Update WANT_AUTOMAKE atoms to match. Drop 2.71 from _LATEST_AUTOCONF since 2.72 is stable. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/948125 Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/40187 eclass/autotools.eclass | 21 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+),

[gentoo-dev] tinderbox on stable

2025-01-17 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello everyone, Typically, most of the tests we perform on Tinderbox are done on ~arch. However, I’d like to start testing on stable to help improve the overall user experience. With the recent changes in compilers (gcc-14/15, modern-c, c23), we may have missed stable ebuilds that fail to com

[gentoo-dev] Google Summer of Code for Gentoo for the year 2025

2025-01-14 Thread Yury German
Hey everyone! The Google Summer of Code (GSoC) has announced the new application deadline for organizations. Gentoo needs to submit their application with proposed projects by February 11th. They’ve specifically requested more “Security and AI/ML” projects for GSoC. We’re seeking volunteers to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: Emit a warning if the package uses 300+ crates

2025-01-14 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 2025-01-14 at 17:56 +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote: > > It certainly feels like all of a sudden to me. At least, as far as I > understand, there is no trigger event or similar. I am sorry, but > instead, it appears that you have decided that today is the day when we > need this. I know i

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: Emit a warning if the package uses 300+ crates

2025-01-14 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 13/01/2025 14.36, Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 2025-01-13 at 10:40 +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote: First, switching from individual crates to a single crate tarball disallows inter-package crate archive reuse. Often, users will already have the required crates downloaded because another installe

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: Emit a warning if the package uses 300+ crates

2025-01-13 Thread Ionen Wolkens
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 05:23:54AM -0800, orbea wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 10:40:30 +0100 > Florian Schmaus wrote: > > > On 12/01/2025 13.56, Michał Górny wrote: > > > Emit a QA warning suggesting the use of crate tarball, when the > > > package in question uses 300 crates or more. Such a long

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: Emit a warning if the package uses 300+ crates

2025-01-13 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2025-01-13 at 10:40 +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote: > First, switching from individual crates to a single crate tarball > disallows inter-package crate archive reuse. Often, users will already > have the required crates downloaded because another installed package > used them. With an arti

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: Emit a warning if the package uses 300+ crates

2025-01-13 Thread orbea
ct party that can inject malicious code. > Considering the recent supply chain attacks, this alone is a > show-stopper. > > Why is this warning suddenly necessary? Did a user run into an issue > caused by more than 300 entries? > > - Flow > > 1: > https://public-inbox.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/6ed0f286-f9eb-9e93-4fec-296646f79...@gentoo.org/ > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: Emit a warning if the package uses 300+ crates

2025-01-13 Thread Florian Schmaus
in attacks, this alone is a show-stopper. Why is this warning suddenly necessary? Did a user run into an issue caused by more than 300 entries? - Flow 1: https://public-inbox.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/6ed0f286-f9eb-9e93-4fec-296646f79...@gentoo.org/

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: Emit a warning if the package uses 300+ crates

2025-01-12 Thread Ionen Wolkens
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 02:30:10PM +, Alexey Sokolov wrote: > 12.01.2025 13:15, Agostino Sarubbo пишет: > > > On domenica 12 gennaio 2025 13:56:39 CET Michał Górny wrote: > > > >> + if [[ ${#crates[@]} -ge 300 ]]; then > > > >> + eqawarn "This package uses a very large number of > > > >> CRATE

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: Emit a warning if the package uses 300+ crates

2025-01-12 Thread Alexey Sokolov
12.01.2025 13:15, Agostino Sarubbo пишет: > On domenica 12 gennaio 2025 13:56:39 CET Michał Górny wrote: > >> + if [[ ${#crates[@]} -ge 300 ]]; then > >> + eqawarn "This package uses a very large number of > >> CRATES. Please provide" + eqawarn "a crate tarball > >> instead and fetch it via SRC_UR

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: Emit a warning if the package uses 300+ crates

2025-01-12 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On domenica 12 gennaio 2025 13:56:39 CET Michał Górny wrote: > + if [[ ${#crates[@]} -ge 300 ]]; then > + eqawarn "This package uses a very large number of > CRATES. Please provide" + eqawarn "a crate tarball > instead and fetch it via SRC_

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: Emit a warning if the package uses 300+ crates

2025-01-12 Thread Michał Górny
Emit a QA warning suggesting the use of crate tarball, when the package in question uses 300 crates or more. Such a long crate lists cause ebuilds and Manifests to grow very fast, causing significant space consumption on end user systems (including users who are not using the package in question)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last-rites: net-im/psi and net-im/psimedia

2025-01-11 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Samstag, 11. Jänner 2025 11:59:08 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Alexey Sokolov wrote: > The version in ::rion is maintained and uses qt6. Only though. Thanks, I've amended the package.mask notice accordingly. Regards signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: net-misc/fatrat

2025-01-11 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2025-01-11) # Last release from 2012, dead upstream for 7 years, no Gentoo maintainer. # Depends on dev-qt/qtwebengine:5, removed from almost every other distro. # Bugs #741849, #830220, #851507 and #926672. Removal on 2025-02-10. net-misc/fatrat signature.asc Description:

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last-rites: net-im/psi and net-im/psimedia

2025-01-11 Thread Alexey Sokolov
11.01.2025 10:09, Andreas Sturmlechner пишет: > # Andreas Sturmlechner (2025-01-11) > # Last release from 2020, effectively unmaintained in Gentoo. > # Depends on Qt5, app-crypt/qca[qt5] and dev-qt/qtwebengine:5. > # Bugs #755446, #926138, #926670. Removal on 2025-02-10. > net-im/psi > net-im/psim

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: net-im/psi and net-im/psimedia

2025-01-11 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2025-01-11) # Last release from 2020, effectively unmaintained in Gentoo. # Depends on Qt5, app-crypt/qca[qt5] and dev-qt/qtwebengine:5. # Bugs #755446, #926138, #926670. Removal on 2025-02-10. net-im/psi net-im/psimedia signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signe

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: dev-libs/qoauth

2025-01-11 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2025-01-11) # Qt5-based library without any revdeps. Depends on app-crypt/qca[qt5]. # Removal on 2025-02-10. dev-libs/qoauth signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: net-im/dianara

2025-01-11 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2025-01-11) # Last release from 2020, dead upstream; Depends on app-crypt/qca[qt5]. # Bug #935556. Removal on 2025-02-10. net-im/dianara signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] A new bugzilla keyword for bug investigation

2025-01-10 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On venerdì 10 gennaio 2025 17:12:28 CET Rich Freeman wrote: > Makes a lot of sense, though I'm not sure if it could cause confusion > for bug wrangling/etc. I don't think non-prived bugzilla users could > add the keyword though, so probably no impact there? > > The bug wranglers might actually li

Re: [gentoo-dev] A new bugzilla keyword for bug investigation

2025-01-10 Thread Immolo
I like this idea, but prefer NEEDS-INVESTIGATION over NEEDS-TRIAGE as the latter to me is just the state before bugwranglers assign it. Using https://bugs.gentoo.org/946338 as an example and following on from Rich's thinking out loud. I think the person reporting the bug will be one calling for th

Re: [gentoo-dev] A new bugzilla keyword for bug investigation

2025-01-10 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 3:17 AM Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > > For that reason I would like to propose a new bugzilla KEYWORD, like: > > > - NEEDS-TRIAGE > > or > > - NEEDS-INVESTIGATION Makes a lot of sense, though I'm not sure if it could cause confusion for bug wrangling/etc. I don't think non-p

Re: [gentoo-dev] A new bugzilla keyword for bug investigation

2025-01-10 Thread Jaco Kroon
As someone that sometimes calls in help in trying to understand some of the reports +1 Yes please.  That way I can just indicate help needed and don't have to load it onto someone I have contact with (typically Sam). I'm sure this will take some load off of Sam specifically. Kind regards, J

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-cluster/zetcd

2025-01-10 Thread Arthur Zamarin
# Arthur Zamarin (2025-01-10) # EAPI=7, maintainer needed, no reverse dependencies, fails to compile, # uses deprecated Go eclass. # Removal on 2025-02-09. Bugs #947810, #856319, #844730, #771048, #679078. sys-cluster/zetcd OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Up for grabs: app-i18n/uchardet, app-misc/dateutils

2025-01-10 Thread Ionen Wolkens
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 01:49:37PM +0200, Viorel Munteanu wrote: > Hi, > > Due to maintainer retiring, these packages are now up for grabs: > > - app-i18n/uchardet, not up to date, 0 open bugs Guess I'll take this one given mpv optionally depends on it. -- ionen signature.asc Description: PGP

[gentoo-dev] Up for grabs: app-i18n/uchardet, app-misc/dateutils

2025-01-10 Thread Viorel Munteanu
Hi, Due to maintainer retiring, these packages are now up for grabs: - app-i18n/uchardet, not up to date, 0 open bugs - app-misc/dateutils, not up to date, 5 open bugs. Regards, Viorel OpenPGP_0x67992BD27934AEA4.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: Open

[gentoo-dev] A new bugzilla keyword for bug investigation

2025-01-10 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Good morning everyone, during tinderbox activity I realized that sometimes there are bugs with unknown causes at the time of filing. Examples are: - no "error: " string - mysterious test failures - hidden bugs on build.log but present on config.log and/or additional files - bugs that may be rel

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-qt/qtstyleplugins

2025-01-09 Thread James Le Cuirot
# James Le Cuirot (2025-01-09) # Obsolete and needs to be dropped along with Qt5. The GTK theme has been # superseded by dev-qt/qtbase[gtk], which uses GTK 3 rather than GTK 2. # Removal on 2025-02-09. See bug #947787. dev-qt/qtstyleplugins signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed m

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: app-text/fbreader

2025-01-09 Thread Andrey Grozin
# Andrey Grozin (2024-01-09) # Unsupported old version, newer versions are not open-source. # Depends on Qt5. # Bugs 499030, 437262, 597268, 603592, 734890, 745495, 947740. # Use app-text/crqt-ng instead. # Removal on 2025-02-08. app-text/fbreader

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: dev-db/tora

2025-01-08 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2024-01-08) # Last release from 2017; fails to build w/ GCC-14 and qscintilla-2.14.1. # Depends on Qt5. Removal on 2025-02-08. dev-db/tora signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: dev-libs/kqoauth

2025-01-08 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2024-01-08) # Qt5-based library without any revdeps. Removal on 2025-02-07. dev-libs/kqoauth signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: dev-libs/qcoro5

2025-01-08 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2024-01-08) # Qt5-based library without any revdeps. Removal on 2025-02-07. dev-libs/qcoro5 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] dev-dotnet/dotnet-sdk: use DOTNET_VERBOSITY, like the dotnet-pkg-base eclass

2025-01-07 Thread xgqt
From: Maciej Barć Signed-off-by: Maciej Barć --- dev-dotnet/dotnet-sdk/dotnet-sdk-8.0.107-r2.ebuild | 6 +++--- dev-dotnet/dotnet-sdk/dotnet-sdk-9.0.101.ebuild| 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/dev-dotnet/dotnet-sdk/dotnet-sdk-8.0.107-r2.ebuild b/dev

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eclass/dotnet-pkg-base.eclass: add DOTNET_VERBOSITY user variable

2025-01-07 Thread xgqt
From: Maciej Barć DOTNET_VERBOSITY controls dotnet restore/build/test verbosity. We allow the user to set this value to any other to value because it might be helpful when debugging dotnet processes. On the other hand, generally warnings and errors provide enough info for debugging package emerge

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-ruby/dust

2025-01-06 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff (2025-01-06) # ruby32-only package. Depends on assumptions that are no longer true # in ruby33. No reverse dependencies left. Last release in 2007. # Upstream gone. Removal on 2025-02-06. dev-ruby/dust signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-plugins/gst-plugins-kate

2025-01-05 Thread Sam James
# Sam James (2025-01-05) # Removed upstream in gstreamer-1.24. See bug #947522. Removal on 2025-02-05. media-plugins/gst-plugins-kate

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] sci-physics/root: rename uring USE flag to io-uring

2025-01-04 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi Filip, Unsure if this has been merged already...  If so I'll simply fix glusterfs when next I bump, otherwise, please for the three updated packages: The metadata.xml should retain alphabetical order.  This is really moot since io-uring goes global in 3/3, so the +lines here are just dest

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] New global USE flag: sndio

2025-01-03 Thread Filip Kobierski
Hello everyone, after successfully proposing making io-uring global I will propose another global USE flag: sndio. As of right how 19 packages would use it[1] and only two of them (waybar & scrummvm) provide details on what it provides exactly. I think the generic descroption like "Enable suppor

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 2/2] mono.eclass: mark as DEAD

2025-01-03 Thread Petr Vaněk
On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 04:23:08PM +0100, Petr Vaněk wrote: > The eclass is no longer used by any package in the tree nor in ::dotnet > overlay. If there are no objections to this change, should I send the last-rite email now or once it is merged? Petr > Signed-off-by: Petr Vaněk > --- > eclas

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] mono.eclass: mark as DEAD

2025-01-03 Thread Petr Vaněk
The eclass is no longer used by any package in the tree nor in ::dotnet overlay. Signed-off-by: Petr Vaněk --- eclass/mono.eclass | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/mono.eclass b/eclass/mono.eclass index c096acc8c40e..d4f45e5acf70 100644 --- a/eclass/m

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] dotnet.eclass: mark as deprecated

2025-01-03 Thread Petr Vaněk
The eclass has last two consumers in the tree. One of them is already last-rited, the second is slowly rotting. The eclass is used in ::dotnet overlay, which does not seem to be very active and it is not in good shape. Signed-off-by: Petr Vaněk --- eclass/dotnet.eclass | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-03 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Freitag, 3. Jänner 2025 03:38:16 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Ionen Wolkens wrote: > Qt5 base packages aren't the biggest worry even if we leave them > semi-abandoned (not that qtcore isn't pretty quirky and already with a > lot of small issues that will likely get worse), albeit it'd be nice t

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] profiles/use.desc: make USE=io-uring global

2025-01-03 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 01/01/2025 23.41, Filip Kobierski wrote: > Signed-off-by: Filip Kobierski > --- > app-containers/lxc/metadata.xml| 1 - > app-emulation/qemu/metadata.xml| 1 - > dev-ruby/io-event/metadata.xml | 3 --- > media-sound/mpd/metadata.xml

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-02 Thread Ionen Wolkens
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 07:56:03PM +, Sam James wrote: > Zoltan Puskas writes: > > >> > >> So, removing Qt5 will break computers of many users, including my computer. > >> In the course of many years of existence of Qt5 a large number of useful > >> programs have been created; not all of the

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-servers/xsp

2025-01-02 Thread Maciej Barć
profiles/package.mask: mask www-servers/xsp # Maciej Barć (2025-01-02) # Upstream dead, repo archived (https://github.com/mono/xsp). Uses deprecated # "dotnet" eclass. Depends on old mono. As a replacement one can use official # .NET 6.0-9.0 ASP.NET instead. # Removal on 2025-02-02 acct-group

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sci-mathematics/lean:0/3 and sci-mathematics/mathlib-tools

2025-01-02 Thread Maciej Barć
profiles/package.mask: mask lean 3 and mathlib-tools # Maciej Barć (2025-01-02) # Deprecated LEAN 3 packages. The "mathlib-tools" repo is archived # (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib-tools). Migrate to LEAN 4. # Removal on 2025-02-02 sci-mathematics/lean:0/3 sci-mathematics/math

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: dev-libs/libqt5pas

2025-01-02 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2024-01-02) # No more revdeps, depends on Qt5. Removal on 2025-01-29. dev-libs/libqt5pas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-02 Thread Sam James
Zoltan Puskas writes: >> >> So, removing Qt5 will break computers of many users, including my computer. >> In the course of many years of existence of Qt5 a large number of useful >> programs have been created; not all of them have been ported to Qt6. Are we >> going to throw away all this wealt

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-02 Thread Sam James
Andrey Grozin writes: > Here are some packages installed on my computer and (to various > degrees) important for me which depend on Qt5 > I'll note again that at the moment, we're talking about "things which support Qt 6, but the ebuild doesn't even acknowledge that right now, or the ebuild stil

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] toolchain.eclass: Don't prefixify dynamic linker for cross-compilers

2025-01-02 Thread Sam James
James Le Cuirot writes: > Cross environments within a prefixed system do not have a nested prefix, > i.e. they are located at ${EPREFIX}/usr/${CHOST}, not > ${EPREFIX}/usr/${CHOST}/${EPREFIX}. Binaries built with the > cross-compiler should therefore get an unprefixed dynamic linker path by > def

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-02 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 1/2/25 1:36 AM, Andrey Grozin wrote: > Here are some packages installed on my computer and (to various degrees) > important for me which depend on Qt5 > > 1. x11-wm/lumina > An excellent desktop environment. I use it for many years. > I contacted the upstream about the possibility to port it to

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-02 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Donnerstag, 2. Januar 2025 20:03:29 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Philip Webb wrote: > When I updated to KDE 6 , I reluctantly had to drop Krusader When you updated to *Plasma 6*, nothing forced you to do that at all. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-02 Thread Philip Webb
250102 James Le Cuirot wrote: > There may be some confusion here. The list includes packages > like www-client/vivaldi, which already support both versions. > It is also sometimes possible to simply rebuild against Qt6 > with no changes but not always. When I updated to KDE 6 , I reluctantly had t

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-02 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Donnerstag, 2. Jänner 2025 12:37:47 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Ulrich Müller wrote: > Can you provide a pointer to a Qt upstream page saying that Qt 5 is > deprecated? Just for the case that the upstreams of my packages need > further convincing. Not sure I can, without accompanying explanat

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-02 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Donnerstag, 2. Jänner 2025 12:29:01 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Alexey Sokolov wrote: > 02.01.2025 11:22, James Le Cuirot пишет: > > On Thu, 2025-01-02 at 03:13 -0800, Zoltan Puskas wrote: > > There may be some confusion here. The list includes packages like > > www-client/vivaldi, which alrea

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-02 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Donnerstag, 2. Jänner 2025 12:29:01 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Alexey Sokolov wrote: > 02.01.2025 11:22, James Le Cuirot пишет: > > On Thu, 2025-01-02 at 03:13 -0800, Zoltan Puskas wrote: > > There may be some confusion here. The list includes packages like > > www-client/vivaldi, which alrea

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-02 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Donnerstag, 2. Jänner 2025 12:13:22 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Zoltan Puskas wrote: > > So, removing Qt5 will break computers of many users, including my > > computer. > > [...] > > I have to agree with Andrey here, the list contains quite a few items [...] My message did not seek to gettin

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] toolchain.eclass: Don't prefixify dynamic linker for cross-compilers

2025-01-02 Thread James Le Cuirot
Cross environments within a prefixed system do not have a nested prefix, i.e. they are located at ${EPREFIX}/usr/${CHOST}, not ${EPREFIX}/usr/${CHOST}/${EPREFIX}. Binaries built with the cross-compiler should therefore get an unprefixed dynamic linker path by default so that they work out of the bo

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-02 Thread Viorel Munteanu
La 02.01.2025 13:13, Zoltan Puskas a scris: Additionally there are some projects where the community's influence is limited, eg. Virtualbox which is controlled by Oracle. VirtualBox 7.1 switched to QT6.  It is not yet stable, but it will be soon. sci-electronics/pulseview: Great for interfaci

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-02 Thread Ulrich Müller
> On Wed, 01 Jan 2025, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > If you recognise your package(s) in there, please drop Qt5 in favor of Qt6 > aggressively. If there is no Qt6-based upstream release yet, bug upstream > about it. They may not even know yet this is important. Can you provide a pointer to

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-02 Thread Daniel Buschke
Am 02.01.25 um 12:13 schrieb Zoltan Puskas: So, removing Qt5 will break computers of many users, including my computer. In the course of many years of existence of Qt5 a large number of useful programs have been created; not all of them have been ported to Qt6. Are we going to throw away all

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-02 Thread Alexey Sokolov
02.01.2025 11:22, James Le Cuirot пишет: > On Thu, 2025-01-02 at 03:13 -0800, Zoltan Puskas wrote: >>> So, removing Qt5 will break computers of many users, including my computer. >>> In the course of many years of existence of Qt5 a large number of useful >>> programs have been created; not all of

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-02 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Thu, 2025-01-02 at 03:13 -0800, Zoltan Puskas wrote: > > > > So, removing Qt5 will break computers of many users, including my computer. > > In the course of many years of existence of Qt5 a large number of useful > > programs have been created; not all of them have been ported to Qt6. Are we >

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-02 Thread Lucio Sauer
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 06:36:32AM +, Andrey Grozin wrote: > Here are some packages installed on my computer and (to various degrees) > important for me which depend on Qt5 > > 4. app-text/master-pdf-editor > The only tool for editing pdf files. I have to use it every time I check and > correc

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-02 Thread Zoltan Puskas
> > So, removing Qt5 will break computers of many users, including my computer. > In the course of many years of existence of Qt5 a large number of useful > programs have been created; not all of them have been ported to Qt6. Are we > going to throw away all this wealth? > I have to agree with A

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-01 Thread Andrey Grozin
Here are some packages installed on my computer and (to various degrees) important for me which depend on Qt5 1. x11-wm/lumina An excellent desktop environment. I use it for many years. I contacted the upstream about the possibility to port it to Qt6. They said that before that they have to por

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] sci-physics/root: rename uring USE flag to io-uring

2025-01-01 Thread Filip Kobierski
Signed-off-by: Filip Kobierski --- sci-physics/root/metadata.xml | 2 +- sci-physics/root/root-6.30.08.ebuild | 8 sci-physics/root/root-6.32.06.ebuild | 8 sci-physics/root/root-6.32.08.ebuild | 8 sci-physics/root/root-6.34.02.ebuild | 8 sci

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] profiles/use.desc: make USE=io-uring global

2025-01-01 Thread Filip Kobierski
Signed-off-by: Filip Kobierski --- app-containers/lxc/metadata.xml| 1 - app-emulation/qemu/metadata.xml| 1 - dev-ruby/io-event/metadata.xml | 3 --- media-sound/mpd/metadata.xml | 1 - profiles/use.desc

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/3] sys-cluster/{ceph,glusterfs}: rename uring USE flag to io-uring

2025-01-01 Thread Filip Kobierski
Signed-off-by: Filip Kobierski --- sys-cluster/ceph/ceph-18.2.4-r3.ebuild | 8 sys-cluster/ceph/ceph-19.2.0-r2.ebuild | 8 sys-cluster/ceph/metadata.xml | 2 +- sys-cluster/glusterfs/glusterfs-10.5.ebuild | 6 +++--- sys-cluster/glusterfs/glusterfs-11.1.e

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >