Duncan wrote:
> Is anybody subscribed by mail getting stuff on project yet? If neither
> gmane or gentoo's archives are showing anything...
I've received two mails (I believe that's all) after subscribing sometime
wednesday.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Ryan Hill wrote:
> These are on gmane now as well. -dev-announce as RO and -project as RW.
I'm sure everyone is busy and this is already in the works, but updating the
list page [1] would be helpful as well -- along with any other documentation
that might be appropriate.
Is there a concise descr
I'm (obviously) not a dev but contribute some from time to time. Not much more
can be said than has already been stated, but since (I believe) this thread
started out asking for input, I just wanted to toss in a negative vote.
Essentially I don't see it solving any problem and stepping on the toes
Mike Frysinger wrote:
use this instead ... makes for cleaner output:
pushd "${BUILDDIR}" > /dev/null
Would `cd foo` and `cd -` work just as well in place of `pushd` and `popd`?
Recent tip I ran across and wondering if it holds up across the board.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 09:51:58 +0100 "Christopher O'Neill"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Ideally, what I'd like is for the various dev teams to compile a
| weekly status report, which could then be compiled into the weekly
| newsletter (which currently seems to be lacking much
Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
I would also suggest creation of a gentoo-dev-help@ mailing-list.
Something similar to what, i guess, the homonym IRC chan is, but for
people who don't like IRC.
I like this idea as well and agree with the reasoning snip'ed out. As for other
mail about -user,
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
* If we're looking to increase the flow of end users -> super users ->
developers, perhaps we should focus more upon improving development
tools or development documentation.
I'm a little late jumping into this and I haven't read all the threads yet,
however I agree wit
Mike Frysinger wrote:
the idea is that it's common sense and to need to vote on something like this
seems asinine
if devs are uncomfortable with common courtesy and need to be told by the
council in order for this to happen, so be it
hopefully devs will just "get it"
Again, I'm just a user
Jon Portnoy wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:47:11PM -0500, lnxg33k wrote:
uncomfortable or threatened is not a productive one." This is odd
considering that the OP calls anyone who disagrees a terrorist. I'm pretty
speechless over this one (and annoyed) so I'll leave it as
Stephen P. Becker wrote:
I fail to see how pointing out a post was offtopic is mean. Rather, it
will save that individual (and hopefully others) from making the same
mistake in the future.
Also, RTFM is absolutely the right answer more often than not.
Otherwise, what is the point of having TFM
From an outsiders point of view, this looks really, really ridiculous. I
personally feel that if something like this is even needed (which I don't
believe), then it shouldn't be phrased as a "Code of Conduct" which implies
strict compliance thereof. That's the gist of what I wanted to toss in, b
On 2/13/06, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But... If INVALID is renamed, could we get a new GOAWAY resolution for
people who really deserve it?
Like others here, I've also felt a bit stunned at an INVALID bug. Personally, I
don't think anything needs to be renamed, but I would like
Thomas Cort wrote:
> When emerging wxGTK-2.4.2-r4 on alpha I get a QA message about
> executable stacks ( http://bugs.gentoo.org/113119#c10 ). I read the
> GNU Stack Quickstart (
> http://gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/gnu-stack.xml ). However, I
> couldn't find any assembly files for wxGTK (ls -R | g
I'm just a user, but I personally would prefer the three separate ebuilds. If a
meta-ebuild was included as an additional way to build, that'd be fine. I
update whenever a new version comes out, but only build -kernel after updating
the kernel. This makes sense as being the most efficient way to go
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 14:49 -0600, lnxg33k wrote:
> USE=doc emerge catalyst
>
> That gives the definitive spec file templates which are well documented.
> The online documentation is still for catalyst 1.x, which will be phased
> out over the nex
George Prowse wrote:
> On 24/11/05, lnxg33k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:49:18 +0100 Filip Bartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>wrote:
>>>| I want have Gentoo in e-shop with Linux distrib
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:49:18 +0100 Filip Bartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | I want have Gentoo in e-shop with Linux distributions. I find, that
> | Gentoo is under GNU/GPL. Must I distribute in e-shop sources of
> | Gentoo too? Where I can found them(sources)? Where
A few posts here have mentioned Catalyst and its respective documentation. I
remember tossing out some bugs about the docs and was told they were old and
being redone. A quick google seems to bring up some dated stuff. Anyway, are
those docs up yet (I'd even be interested in working copies) and, if
Looks nice in Firefox-1.0.7-r3 with SyncMaster710N (birghtness 35, contrast 65).
Suggestions (wrt http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org):
1) The additional links in green at the top look out of place, a bit hard to
read, and there lacks any break between the links adding to reading difficulty
and, perhaps
Hello. First time posting; hope the message isn't ugly.
Anyway, from a generic point of view, I think the different suggestions
mentioned are all nice. One argument that seems to have cropped up in the latter
messages regards those users who do not keep up with news, break their system
and then cr
20 matches
Mail list logo
