Hey again!
Some of the packages I offered for grabs have been taken
a while ago, thanks everyone. Here are the remaining ones:
* Wolfram Schlich [2012-12-01 11:02]:
> [...]
> Feel free to take care of the following packages that I used to
> maintain a while ago but don't anymore
* Diego Elio Pettenò [2012-12-01 21:31]:
> On 01/12/2012 01:59, Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> > - RAID controller utils:
>
> Maybe we should add sysadmin herd as fallback for these?
+1 from me.
Anyone from the sysadmin herd speaking up (for or against it)? :)
> > sys-block
Hey Jesus!
* Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) [2012-12-01 15:43]:
> On Dec 1, 2012 5:01 AM, "Wolfram Schlich" wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Feel free to take care of the following packages that I used to
> > maintain a while ago but don't anymore due
Hi!
Feel free to take care of the following packages that I used to
maintain a while ago but don't anymore due to change of interest:
- RAID controller utils:
sys-block/afacli(older Adaptec)
sys-block/dellmgr (older Dell-branded LSI MegaRAID)
sys-block/hpacucli (HP/Compaq Smar
* Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-25 20:42]:
> Obviously there are an infinite number of possible approaches. The
> main reason I brought this up was that a user had expressed a desire
> to have package.keywords for use in private profiles (not the
> official gentoo ones). The question of w
tel, bristuff and the florz patch are you going to
commit anyway?
Thanks :)
--
Regards,
Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
* Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-27 02:31]:
> * Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-27 02:24]:
> > * Hanno Böck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-26 15:39]:
> > > [...]
> > > So I'd like to unmask it soon. Please, if you're u
* Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-27 02:24]:
> * Hanno Böck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-26 15:39]:
> > [...]
> > So I'd like to unmask it soon. Please, if you're using mailman test it,
> > tell
> > me if it suits your ne
sh:14178] uid/euid:280/280 gid/egid:280/280, \
parent /bin/bash[bash:14173] uid/euid:280/280 gid/egid:280/280
That's because /usr/lib/mailman/bin/ is group-writable.
Is that necessary at all?!
--
Regards,
Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
eople really use this ebuild.
pkg_postinst() says...
--8<--
* Please read /usr/share/doc/mailman-2.1.9-r2/README.gentoo.gz for additional
* Setup information, mailman will NOT run unless you follow
* those instructions!
--8<--
...but that README actually has .bz2 instead of .gz on
gt; me if it suits your needs or just give me feedback like "worksforme", I
> actually don't have a clue how many people really use this ebuild.
Any special hints/advice?
--
Regards,
Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
* Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-20 02:26]:
> Wolfram Schlich kirjoitti:
> > * Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-09 10:13]:
> >> On 08:54 Fri 09 Nov , Wolfram Schlich (wschlich) wrote:
> >>> 1.1 sys-process
* Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-09 10:13]:
> On 08:54 Fri 09 Nov , Wolfram Schlich (wschlich) wrote:
> > 1.1 sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.4.ebuild
> >
> > file :
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-process
* Robert Buchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-08 05:53]:
> On Thursday, 4. October 2007, Josh Sled wrote:
> > Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > * Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-03 19:12]:
> > >> On 12:43 Wed 03 Oct
* Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-03 19:12]:
> On 12:43 Wed 03 Oct , Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> > And *please*, don't send such mails to this
> > list *and* to my address in addition.
>
> You can add a procmail rule to detect duplicates using a
* Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-03 10:55]:
> On 08:51 Wed 03 Oct , Wolfram Schlich (wschlich) wrote:
> > 1.1 sys-fs/ncdu/ncdu-1.3.ebuild
> >
> > file :
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/ncdu/nc
* Dimitry Bradt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-27 21:20]:
> let's see if the bugday publicity at fosdem helps this project (at least
> i hope so!)
...since FOSDEM my telephone is configured to remind me on
the first saturday every month -- let's see if it actually
works ;
n transition to mdadm nicely but i
> think
> it's about time we let it go
/vote yes
--
Regards,
Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
#x27;s an open bug for this issue :(
Greg,
what's the best way to just completely disable udev coldplug-like
module loading?
TIA.
--
Regards,
Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
* Rumi Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-14 07:42]:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:15:46 +0100
> Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In what ChangeLog, the portage package ChangeLog?
> > Yeah, I also had to look at the OpenSSH ChangeLog to find out tha
this doesn't look like as if it would have been integrated...
The sftp-server(8) binary has new command line options that influence
SFTP logging:
-f log_facility
-l log_level
The sftplogging also contains functionality to control umask and permit
chmod and chgrp, which the upstream sftp-server does not provide.
--
Wolfram Schlich
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
the security team currently face serious problems that need to be
solved, be it inside or outside the security team?
I am just curious and would be glad to get some feedback :)
--
Regards,
Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/
--
gentoo-dev@gent
/ URLs?
I like it.
--
Wolfram Schlich
pgphYpykv9sBG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
23 matches
Mail list logo
