Because of this bug, 2007.0 has dropped soem of the ATM-based support we
had in 2006.1, as there comes a time when we simply can't wait for bugs
to get fixed anymore if we ever plan on releasing, and we're already
*way* behind the schedule that we wanted to release under.
Ok, what needs done
linux-headers isnt anything to do with me or the kernel herd. I can't
comment on when it will go stable.
k, my bad, who should I be speaking to about what I can do to get it sorted?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Daniel Drake wrote:
I'm planning to request the latest revision of gentoo-sources-2.6.20
go stable on x86 and amd64 in 1-2 weeks from now. Other arches will
probably follow soon after.
There are still a few new bugs with external modules:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163825
I've c
these
are irrelevant. So, to quote from the two of you, the primary goal
should be a good distribution (quality is good), in order to keep
developers happy and sane.
--
Warwick Bruce Chapman
Who cares about views? It is our distro and we just like to make it
better. Right?
There is a plethora of potential Gentoo developers out there and this
sort of press does nothing for getting them any closer to joining the
effort.
Secondly, regarding the DW article, surely if it was as
