> Works fine. :)
Well, it's good :)
> Give me a RAR5, and I can test it for you.
I'm sorry, not RAR5, but RAR4. I've attached "old" rar_v3.rar and
"new" rar_v4.rar.
rar_v3.rar
Description: application/rar
rar_v4.rar
Description: application/rar
But does it work for RAR5?
31 авг. 2017 г. 10:05 пользователь "Alexander Berntsen"
написал:
> Just a note in case anyone is relying on this package for RAR files;
> check out unar. It's LGPL, and works for e.g. RARv3.
> --
> Alexander
> berna...@gentoo.org
> https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
I am willing to help
2016-05-17 12:35 GMT+05:00 Aaron Bauman :
> I am willing to help.
>
> On May 17, 2016 3:36:18 PM GMT+09:00, "Michał Górny"
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello, everyone.
>>
>> It seems that I'm the only person doing Overlays project work these days.
>> This is getting ridiculous to the poin
Well, if vi is posix, and it is so important, then you may use it. But
please, don't delete nano.
2014-09-27 18:40 GMT+06:00 Ciaran McCreesh :
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 18:31:03 +0600
> Vladimir Romanov wrote:
> > Em. I don't agree. I prefer Emacs and don't like Vi
Em. I don't agree. I prefer Emacs and don't like Vim. But if i must choose
between Vim and Nano, i prefer Nano
2014-09-27 18:22 GMT+06:00 Ciaran McCreesh :
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 12:47:14 +0200
> Luca Barbato wrote:
> > Because I'd expect a stage3 to be posix compliant
>
> I agree. It's time to r
