Re: [gentoo-dev] intel packages support

2007-08-30 Thread Stephen Becker
> - - do you see a need, or significant performance increases with the > compilers? Up to gcc/gfortran-4.2, ifc was the only complete FORTRAN-95 > compiler in portage, so there was a definite need among the scientific > community. Performance is probably the big thing. A few months ago I tested s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bye2u Gentoo

2007-05-31 Thread Stephen Becker
On 5/31/07, Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:21 -0700, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote: > Grmbl Can you do us a favor and provide us with a clone, for doing > MIPS keywording? I believe much of that had to do with trying to get a new X livecd released. -Steve -

Re: [gentoo-dev] unmasking packages (was Gentoo's problems)

2007-03-27 Thread Stephen Becker
> I'd advise everybody to try paludis and pkgcore to see how the > alternatives are faring, I must say that I'm quite surprised by how fast > they are. Please could you reassure us that they can co-exist with portage so that one can be certain that changing to either paludis or pkgcore is not irri

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml?

2007-03-15 Thread Stephen Becker
On 3/15/07, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stephen Becker napsal(a): > First of all, get your facts straight. The bugzilla incident of which > you speak happened before all of this. Second of all, the language is > irrelevant. Point is, he was acting like an asshole t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml?

2007-03-15 Thread Stephen Becker
On 3/15/07, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stephen Becker wrote: > I would still have told Diego exactly how I felt about unreasonably > abusing an arch team member who was simply trying to do his job What by abusing him in turn on bugzilla so it would stay part of the public

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml?

2007-03-15 Thread Stephen Becker
> And if said employee had already pulled several "I'm resigning" > publicity stunts in the past? And if said employee had seen other > people trying the same thing unsuccessfully? > Then you deal with them at such a time as they appear, you do not let 2 employees go when everyone's integrity cou