sound/daapd:mpeg4 - Enable AAC metadata support
If I encounter such situations should I create a bug or report them
here?
Ricardo Loureiro
- --
http://pgp.dei.uc.pt:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6B7C0EC0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (
eadlines. Looks like the best shot at this
point is a new package using as much as possible the actual python
libs created for portage.
When I start the project itself (September 1st) I'm gonna start to
write and organize all the ideas, but you all have been a great help
so far.
Ricardo Loure
el's pdf with just a drawing of the arch itself,
nothing very useful to me. Also the latest news go back almost 2
years. Is there a place with more information on what portage-ng
should be?
Ricardo Loureiro
--
http://pgp.dei.uc.pt:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6B7C0EC0
pgpV7ARwSYQ0z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
on, no pressure on other ppl and
limited time for the project, but I hope to have the time to change
it after the deadline as a personal hobbie.
> But as Donnie said, gentoo-portage-dev is the better list for this
> discussion.
Did already, thanks for your help already.
Ricardo Loureiro
--
http://pgp.dei.uc.pt:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6B7C0EC0
pgpdiIpQMZHcF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
so
a BSD project can have a GPL fork. I didn't thought about changing
Portage itself simply because I don't know if the changes are welcome
to Gentoo itself, probably more a Gentoo server project. But if that
is a possibility I have no problems with GPL.
Ricardo Loureiro
--
http://pgp.dei.uc.pt:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6B7C0EC0
pgpAfos95zS2k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
need to think), so I'd love to ear from users
dealing with this kind of scenario, question, comments, whatever you
think I should focus on. Oh, a name for the project would be welcome
=)
Thanks in advance,
Ricardo Loureiro
--
http://pgp.dei.uc.pt:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6B7C0E
he idea of valid technical support from the gentoo staff
moderators.
Ricardo Loureiro
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:45:40 +0100
Tom Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After the discussion today about the forums GLEP [1], we've made
> some changes:
>
> All the c
Hi again,
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:47:42 +0100
twofourtysix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 28/06/05, Ricardo Loureiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also, I truly doubt that any moderator would refuse to be
> > considered a Gentoo staff or anything gentoo related, other
choose to
give their free time to the forums?
That's just my 2 cents as a local moderator.
Ricardo Loureiro
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 19:09:41 +0200
Haas Wernfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> With reference to the recent thread about this GLEP's draft [1]
> we'
