Hi,
Please have a look at the following news item.
Thanks!
Title: sys-devel/kgcc64 removal on sparc
Author: Raúl Porcel
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2014-11-11
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Profile: default/linux/sparc
sys-devel/kgcc64 is going to be removed from the sparc
On 07/26/14 19:33, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 07/27/2014 03:19 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> If an arch team isn't going to honor a stable request, shouldn't they
>> remove themselves from it and say so?
>>
>> Also, if an arch team does that, does that mean we don't have to file
>> stable requests
On 02/17/13 17:03, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> In the last time I'm helping some other arches (also arches which I have no
> interest) because they appears understaffed.
>
> Days ago, I tried to make a virtual machine with qemu, for SH since the dev-
> machine[1] is a bit slow; well, I discovered w
On 01/20/13 10:32, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Looks like no package is included in it, I think we should drop
> that herd then
>
> Do you agree?
>
>
+1
On 04/27/2012 07:29 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Since I've been configuring a couple of systems lately for remote
> access, which include configuring the serial console, I'm wondering if
> it would be a good idea to change our inittab so that the default
> (commented out) definition of the seri
Hi,
The other day Markus(maekke) found an issue i encountered two years ago.
An app supports only a subarchitecture of the ARM architecture.
For those that don't know the ARM architecture, its an architecture
which is mostly used on embedded and/or mobile devices(cell phones,
mostly), also there'
On 07/22/2011 03:11 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Hello fellow devs,
> [snip]
Yey i'm number two :D
# Raúl Porcel (24 Jan 2010)
# Upstream stopped developing open source version,
# heavy patching done by Fedora
# and they've deprecated it for some time ago.
# net-misc/tigervnc is its replacement
# To be removed in 30 days
net-misc/vnc
scarabeus told me that the eclass can't be removed until two years since
the deprecation date, so...
Removal of the eclass on 2012/01/11
Raúl Porcel wrote:
> This is an ancient eclass that was used when the Compaq C Compiler still
> worked, but was removed from the tree so
This is an ancient eclass that was used when the Compaq C Compiler still
worked, but was removed from the tree some time ago.
Removal of the eclass on 2010/02/01.
# Raúl Porcel (22 Oct 2009)
# Not needed anymore, vanilla kernel works
# pretty well on SH nowadays.
# Removal in 30 days
sys-kernel/sh-sources
Hello,
this announcement is mainly for Gentoo developers: ARM profiles are
marked stable again, that means that repoman will not let you commit
something to the tree if it has ~arm or arm keywords and the deps aren't
met. Right now all the deps are correct, so you shouldn't have any issues.
Thank
Hi guys,
Since there is always new people joining Gentoo, many of these people
tend to open keyword requests for a lot of arches on a package they
maintain or they are interested in until me or any other member of
alternative arches scream to them :) .
As a member of many of the alternative
arche
Since i don't have too much time nor motivation to fix packages(i prefer
doing arch work), i'm asking someone to take the following packages, i'm
dumping them to net-p2p atm, but its just Betelgeuse and me, so feel
free to maintain them.
net-p2p/deluge
net-p2p/qbittorrent
net-libs/rb_libtorrent
Ferris McCormick wrote:
> I nominate:
> ssuominen
> armin76
>
> Perhaps others later.
>
> Regards,
> Ferris
Thanks but I decline.
I'd like to have willikins on #gentoo-openmoko
Contact: armin76
Please, when you need to touch a profile, remember to do it on both
2007.0 and 2008.0 profiles.
The files you need to touch are in:
arch/$ARCH
default-linux/$ARCH
Stop using default/linux/$ARCH unless you need to touch an specific
version of the profile, in that case it would be
default/linux/$AR
And:
#gentoo-mirrors
Contact: fox2mike
As per GMsoft request:
Channel: #gentoo-hppa
Contact: GMsoft, jer
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 03:59:09PM -0500, Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
>>> Err, what do you mean by revision dump?
>> revision dump is when foo-1.0-r4 becomes foo-1.0-r5.
> That's revision 'B'ump, not 'D'ump.
>
bumb!!
#gentoo-alpha
contact: ferdy, yoswink, blackb|rd(klausman), me
#gentoo-sparc
contact: fmccor, bluebird, me
#gentoo-x86
contact: maekke, me
#gentoo-treecleaners
contact: drac, darksiide(darkside), me
And btw, is #gentoo-bots needed anymore?
Thanks
Ryan Hill wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:55:00 +
"Raul Porcel (armin76)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
armin76 08/07/18 17:55:00
Modified: mozcoreconf-2.eclass
Log:
Enable by default mozilla's optimization
+IUSE="${IUSE} custom-optimization"
+
Could you use custom-cf
Vlastimil Babka wrote:
I'd like to nominate:
armin76 (Raúl Porcel)
And i reject :)
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:41:28 +0200
Raúl Porcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Requesting ~arch keywords: Is a maintainer able to request ~arch
keywords, if the package is not a dependency of some other package
which is keyworded, and the maintainer doesn't have that
Requesting ~arch keywords: Is a maintainer able to request ~arch
keywords, if the package is not a dependency of some other package which
is keyworded, and the maintainer doesn't have that arch?
IMHO the packages should be keyworded if an arch team member or an user
of that arch requests it. K
Mike Frysinger wrote:
net-misc/vnc
I already maintain that :P
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
I win, as always *g*
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
The package app-misc/pastemecli is a pastebin client for pasteme.com,
which no
longer exists. Bug 213754
Will be removed in 7 days
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
From yesterday:
PROMLIB: Sun IEEE Boot Prom 3.2.9 2001/08/21 20:14
<4>Linux version 2.4.31 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.6
(Gentoo Linux 3.3.6)) #4 Sun Jul 17 13:51:21 MDT 2005
<4>ARCH: SUN4U
Linux version 2.4.31 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.6 (Gentoo
Linux 3.3.6)) #4 Sun Ju
FYI this will be finally slotted. Turns out it couldn't be slotted
because a patch we used that simulated xulrunner-1.8 pkgconfig files.
But since 99% of the stuff that depends on xulrunner-1.8 won't work with
xulrunner-1.9, those packages should be fixed by upstream, and they
should look for t
Duncan wrote:
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sun, 16 Mar 2008 07:30:00 +0100:
Raúl Porcel wrote:
Xulrunner-1.9 is a big change, and the apps using it won't work until
they are fixed. So this needs to be decided, i've been wor
Okay, so here's the thing: Firefox 3 will be released probably some time
during this year, as you probably know, they released a few days ago
beta4 and beta5 will be out probably at the start of the next month or
so. I started doing ebuilds for net-libs/xulrunner-1.9 and
www-client/mozilla-fire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sdfsdafsdfaf
sdfdfdfdff
Go sparc!
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Richard Freeman wrote:
Raúl Porcel wrote:
Peter Weller wrote:
Oh, I'd be more than happy to accept help from developers like that.
It's just a case of what the "big bosses" think of it. Plus there's
the fact that some other arches operate on a "it compiles, mark i
Peter Weller wrote:
Oh, I'd be more than happy to accept help from developers like that. It's just
a case of what the "big bosses" think of it. Plus there's the fact that some
other arches operate on a "it compiles, mark it stable" policy, and we don't
want developers to bring that attitude t
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
[snip]
I agree 100%, thanks for explaining it better than me :P
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
I want to propose to the council to talk about the amd64 arch team and
its big bug list [1] considering they are the most staffed arch team.
They have some bugs that are more than a month old and they are the last
arch. Same for security bugs, and i think amd64 is an important arch and
has a l
# Raúl Porcel (08 Feb 2008)
# Removal for treecleaners in 60 days
# Will be removed 08 Apr 2008
# Bug 205482, many bugs, dead upstream
net-ftp/swiftfxp
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
# Raúl Porcel (04 Feb 2008)
# Masked for removal in 60 days. That is, 04 Apr 2008
# For treecleaners,
# doesn't compile, last release in 2002,
# bug #152044
dev-libs/tinyq
# Various bugs, upstream dead, gtk-1, last release 2003
# bug 205481
net-ftp/gtkfxp
# Last release 2003, unfixable, do
# Raúl Porcel (16 Jan 2007)
# Doesn't work with stable bittorrent
# Use mktorrent, mktorrent-borg, bittorrent, etc
# Removal in 30 days
net-p2p/eztorrent
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Samuli Suominen wrote:
Since dostrow is being retired or is retired, correct me if I'm wrong
we decided (actually we rolled dices :-) that welp is the new lead.
- drac
You're kidding...
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
# Raúl Porcel (15 Jan 2008)
# Pending removal 15 Feb 2008, upstream discontinued the software
# Unstable, old
net-libs/dclibc
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
# Raúl Porcel (24 Dec 2007)
# Mask for removal on 24 Feb 2008 for treecleaners
# Bug 195228, merged with net-tools
sys-apps/mii-diag
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> this is a reminder especially for architecture people: Please use the
> ChangeLog and really log everything you did. Don't do a change and
> forget to "document" it. Oh and please don't forget to remove your
> arches from the cc field if there is a
=mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-1* is going to be p.masked in 15 days
from now(1 Dec 2007) on all arches except mips, since they don't have
2.0 stable yet.
Mozilla discontinued the 1.5 series since 23 october.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Good job, thanks!
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Fixed :)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> You know, I should check my adress book and what keys I press. Second
> time...I apologize again.
>
> V-Li
>
>
Haha, fail :P
Too much java in your head!
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Okay, so as GNOME-2.14 was removed, mozilla-firefox-1* has to go, it's
unsupported since May 2007. -bin was already removed some months ago.
It will be removed in 15 days.
# Raúl Porcel (13 Aug 2007)
# Vulnerable, unsupported, was supposed to go away
# some months ago, pending removal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Ulrich Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>>> app-emacs/nxml-gentoo-schemacs
>> It's "schemas", not "schemacs". ;-)
>
> Right, Shemacs is the transsexual version of G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luca Barbato wrote:
>
> Workalike client suggested?
>
> lu
>
epic5,epic4,irssi,ircii,ninja,scrollz,weechat
:)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
good, now my nick is armin79 :D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGi8/quQc30/atMkARAp6NAJ4uDVzX4XvRUYbtyN8OpGtl3jZsJACfUb8a
lUkBY2Um0UvbqZiFHOuCL10=
=h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -jokey
- -welp
- -genstef
- -betelgeuse
- -tove
- -uberlord
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGiW4quQc30/atMkARAn9RAKCRvkzlTNxfG3SxeognVlgeecPX9QCgvW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
# Raúl Porcel (01 Jul 2007)
# For treecleaners
# Pending removal in 60 days, 01 Sep 2007
# app-admin/nologin -> bug 182215
# app-office/facturalux -> bug 119971
# x11-themes/jimmac-xcursors -> bug 182216
app-admin/nologin
app-office/factu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Are you for real? Normally its the dev's who scream and rant on the way
> out, not the users...
Touché :D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGcGJQuQ
Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Raúl Porcel wrote:
>> Agreed from mozilla.
>
>> firefox and seamonkey already have the global use-flag
>
> Is there any guideline from mozilla team about what to do when there are
> more than one of these flags (firefox/seamonkey/xulrunner)
In mozilla herd:
During the last month and during the first day of the month we did:
-Stabilize mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.0
-Bump new versions fixing security bugs:
-mozilla-firefox[-bin]-2.0.0.4 and 1.5.0.12, although we didn't put
1.5.0.12 on the tree as it is unsupported
-mozilla-thunderbird
Agreed from mozilla.
firefox and seamonkey already have the global use-flag
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Peter Weller wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:09:52 +0200
> Benjamin Judas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [..snip..]
>
> Is it just me or did you send the same mail to the ML twice?
>
> *sigh*
/me blames welp
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> Bye welp, good look with Ubuntu, we won't miss you :D
I fail, i meant luck :D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Peter Weller wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2007 09:57:58 +0200
> Alexander Færøy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> It is my time to leave Gentoo as well. It has been some exciting
>> months and I have learned a lot from many of you guys.
>>
>> It has been interesting to be in one of the major o
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> "Wulf C. Krueger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>> You will get them tomorrow...promised. :) Too many bugs, not
>>> enough devs...as always.
>> Well, I've offered my help with the amd64 team three times now. Was
>> ignored two times and the third time an initial discussi
# Raúl Porcel (18 May 2007)
# For treecleaners, bug 102174
# Pending removal 17 Jul 2007
www-servers/boa
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Blame drobbins :P
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
>
> If we want to take this to measure, it' a bigger problem for KDE users
> (unless
> built with --as-needed). The list of packages is unfortunately
> quite "impressive". What was your plan wrt. stabilisation of Gnome? I can
> look at the remaining issues this evening, s
Add nero to that list.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
# Raúl Porcel <19 Apr 2007)
# For treecleaners, bug 152520
# Pending removal 19 Jun 2007
net-misc/tlsproxyd
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Sad to see you go. In my pov you really did a good job.
I hope the ones in charge of bugzilla come with a solution to this.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Use repoman || die :)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
beu has retired, and this is a widely used package.
If any dev is using this and want to maintain it, please feel free to
take it.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Peter Weller wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:19:23 -0600
> Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> working here is no longer fun
>> * HUGZ *
>>
>>
>>
>
> Hoi! Giving hugs is a right reserved by me and me only! :P
>
> /me hugs Mike
/me stabs welp
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo
# Raúl Porcel (09 Apr 2007)
# Pending removal 09 Jun 2007, for treecleaners
# app-admin/cpu -> bug 173064
# app-admin/quickswitch -> bug 134335
# app-misc/jive -> bug 142838
# app-text/mgv -> bug 154645
# net-misc/dhcp-agent -> bug 168565
# x11-plugins/wmmail -> bug 73987
app-a
Michael Cummings wrote:
> So, fellow devs, what's new with development? For those interested, genlop has
> migrated into gentoo as a project with the permission of upstream, which no
> longer maintain it. Um...any new tools or projects people are working on?
>
> Anyone?
>
I'm currently fixing al
Alec Warner wrote:
> Much to the joy of many I am now retiring from Gentoo. I've already done
> most of the work (sorry to burden you kloeri I think just the tree-bits
> are left).
>
> Many will wonder why; but this has been a while in coming. I don't get
> along with many like I used to and in
# Raúl Porcel (19 Mar 2007)
# Pending removal 18 May 2007, for treecleaners
# Bug 150966, doesn't work with gcc4 and no new version for 4+ years
www-servers/plb
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Sorry for sending the mail in HTML :)
It won't happen again.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Raúl Porcel kirjoitti:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The mozilla team has decided that the
>> www-client/mozilla-firefox[-bin]-1.5* series will get masked two weeks
>> from now (18 Mar 2007), that is *1 April 2007*. *And will be removed
>> after two w
Hi,
The mozilla team has decided that the
www-client/mozilla-firefox[-bin]-1.5* series will get masked two weeks
from now (18 Mar 2007), that is 1 April 2007. And will be
removed after two weeks from that date, which will be 15 April
2007.
Mozilla will drop support for that series from 24 Apr
# Raúl Porcel (18 Mar 2007)
# Pending removal 17 May 2007, for treecleaners
# www-servers/ncsa-httpd -> bug 122134
# net-im/aim-transport -> bug 145858
www-servers/ncsa-httpd
net-im/aim-transport
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
# Raúl Porcel (11 Mar 2007)
# Mask for removal in 60 days, for treecleaners
# Bug 153355, use net-misc/aria2
net-misc/aria
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
# Raúl Porcel (8 Mar 2007)
# P.masking for treecleaners, pending removal in 60 days
# That is, 8 May 2007
# www-servers/aolserver and its rdeps -> bug 108022
# www-misc/nscache
# www-misc/nsopenssl
# www-misc/nssha1
# www-misc/nsxml
# app-emulation/tiger -> bug 110298
# sys-apps/
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Piotr Jaroszyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>> emacs-w3 - Add support for Emacs/W3 where applicable
>>
>
> No. Removed.
>
> V-Li
>
Die emacs! :D
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
this will get removed in 30 days.
# Raúl Porcel (27 Feb 2007)
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
# Upstream has requested to remove the 0.5 version
# Bug 72996
net-p2p/freenet
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
# Raúl Porcel (20 Feb 2007)
# Masked for removal 19 Mar 2007, bug 135257, security issues
# Replaced by www-client/seamonkey[-bin]
www-client/mozilla
www-client/mozilla-bin
So, amd64 finally stabilized the mono ebuild which doesn't need mozilla,
this can be punted.
--
gentoo-dev@gento
# Raúl Porcel (18 Feb 2007)
# Pending removal 17 Mar 2007, doesn't compile, upstream
# dropped support a long time ago.
net-irc/cyclone
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
# Raúl Porcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (14 Feb 2007)
# Doesn't build, upstream dead, network dead, bug 1666887
# Pending removal 13 Mar 2007
net-p2p/mnet
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Roy Marples wrote:
> OK, so everyone wants to keep their conf.d/net in bash. Fine by me.
>
> Welcome to baselayout-ng which will be a virtual and will not require
> bash.
>
> Now that's out of the way, let's discuss configuration :)
>
> We still need something that is "array like" for want of a bet
# Raúl Porcel (05 Feb 2007)
# Masked, pending removal 04 Mar 2007, unsupported and vulnerable
net-libs/gecko-sdk
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Delayed until we fix some depends on it.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
# Raúl Porcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (27 Jan 2007)
# Masked for removal 26 Feb 2007, bug 135257, security issues
# Replaced by www-client/seamonkey[-bin]
www-client/mozilla
www-client/mozilla-bin
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Okay, removal cancelled as we have new patch to make it work.
Thanks truedfx!
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
# Raúl Porcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (23 Jan 2007)
# Pending removal 22 Feb 2007
# Old, upstream dead, doesn't work with latest version of
# dev-libs/tvision, which is the only version available that compiles.
# Bug 146465
net-p2p/ldcc
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
# Raúl Porcel (21 Jan 2007)
# Pending removal 20 Feb 2007
# Bug 138375
# net-p2p/g2gui: Upstream dead and doesn't work with new mldonkey
# versions. Use net-p2p/sancho-bin or the gui included in mldonkey.
# net-p2p/bittorrent-stats: Doesn't work anymore and is an ancient
# version. Use
# Raúl Porcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (12 Jan 2007)
# Upstream dead almost 3 years ago and doesn't compile with GCC 4.x.
# Pending removal 12 Feb 2007, bug 153268
net-p2p/teknap
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
# Raúl Porcel gentoo.org> (10 Jan 2007)
# Upstream dead almost 2 years ago and doesn't compile with GCC 4.x.
# Pending removal 10 Feb 2007, bug 152464
net-p2p/ww
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
95 matches
Mail list logo
