Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Brent Baude (ranger)

2005-06-30 Thread Omkhar Arasaratnam
y 'Hi' to Brent on IRC, and make him feel welcome. > >Regards, >Tom > > > Congrats ranger - good to have you on board. -- Omkhar Arasaratnam Gentoo PPC64 Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Enterprise deployment tools

2005-06-21 Thread Omkhar Arasaratnam
n't Lock down your make.conf and only roll up update when you deem is neccassary using your internal tree. etc-update may still be an issue -- Omkhar Arasaratnam - Gentoo PPC64 Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://dev.gentoo.org/~omkhar Gentoo Linux / PPC64 Linux: http://ppc64.gentoo.org -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] linux-2.6.12

2005-06-19 Thread Omkhar Arasaratnam
Daniel Drake wrote: >Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote: > > >>That said, we're not RedHat. We ship as MANY features as we can and let >>the user decide. I agree that it is valuable to get reiser4 testing done >>up front. Eventually - some people will use it. Last I c

Re: [gentoo-dev] linux-2.6.12

2005-06-18 Thread Omkhar Arasaratnam
t. We ship as MANY features as we can and let the user decide. I agree that it is valuable to get reiser4 testing done up front. Eventually - some people will use it. Last I checked "I think $FOO is stupid" wasn't a valid closure code in bugzilla ;-) -- Omkhar Arasaratnam - Gentoo PP

Re: [gentoo-dev] linux-2.6.12

2005-06-18 Thread Omkhar Arasaratnam
of an officialy announcement than slashdot.org There should also be a changelog on kernel.org indicating the changes. -- Omkhar Arasaratnam - Gentoo PPC64 Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://dev.gentoo.org/~omkhar Gentoo Linux / PPC64 Linux: http://ppc64.gentoo.org -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] bacula needs lovin'!

2005-06-02 Thread Omkhar Arasaratnam
#x27;ll give it till Wednesday, >then I'll mask them. They really are awful ebuilds. > > > Sorry my gentoo mail has been acting "special" I'll maintain it. -- Omkhar Arasaratnam - Gentoo PPC64 Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://dev.gentoo.org/~omkhar Gentoo L

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Duncan Coutts (dcoutts)

2005-05-07 Thread Omkhar Arasaratnam
t;Tom > >[1] http://www.cis.upenn.edu/proj/plclub/contest/results.php > > > Congrats *omkhar giggles with glee as he's no longer the newbie ;-) -- Omkhar Arasaratnam - Gentoo PPC64 Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://dev.gentoo.org/~omkhar Gentoo Linux / PPC64 Linux: http://ppc64.gentoo.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] OffTopic: VMWare ESX

2005-05-04 Thread Omkhar Arasaratnam
riences? > >Regards, >John > > > John, I've worked with it before and have a number of colleagues in the field - what's up? -- Omkhar Arasaratnam - Gentoo PPC64 Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://dev.gentoo.org/~omkhar Gentoo Linux / PPC64 Linux: http://ppc64.ge

Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware

2005-05-04 Thread Omkhar Arasaratnam
a roadblock here, infact I know many of the people in the Open Source Community of Practice at IBM, so please let me know where you would like this to go. - -- Omkhar Arasaratnam - Gentoo PPC64 Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://dev.gentoo.org/~omkhar Gentoo Linux / PPC64 Linux: http://ppc64.gento

Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware

2005-05-04 Thread Omkhar Arasaratnam
agreements > with Red Hat, and I wasn't even aware of SUSE being present in the > approved list. The only other "corporate blessed Linux" I know of > is the Wal-Mart low end PC that comes with Linspire loaded on it. > > Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote: > >> [EMAIL

Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware

2005-05-04 Thread Omkhar Arasaratnam
ime believing that IBM would endorse a community supported distro. The only distros that IBM supports are corporate backed (RedHat, Suse, Turbo). So unless Gentoo is under going a major change in the near future. That said - I'm frequently wrong ;-) But hey, let us know what you find out - --