Re: [gentoo-dev] upcoming mirror cleansing

2005-04-23 Thread Olivier Crête
On Sat, 2005-23-04 at 23:29 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 08:49:59 -0500 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | Why this matters- around 10,000 files out of 28,600 files will be > | removed from the mirrors network. > > I just had a random thought. Have our GLEP 19 p

Re: [gentoo-dev] circular moves

2005-04-18 Thread Olivier Crête
On Mon, 2005-18-04 at 14:30 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 18 April 2005 11:09 am, Marius Mauch wrote: > > 4Q-2002:move net-misc/atftp net-ftp/atftp > > 3Q-2003:move net-ftp/atftp net-misc/atftp > > personally i dont who thought putting atftp into net-misc from net-ftp was a > good idea

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-irc/xchat-xsys: Test request for ~x86 & ~amd64

2005-04-17 Thread Olivier Crête
Works here without problem On Sun, 2005-17-04 at 12:33 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote: > Could any xchat-xsys users that are not afraid of using an experimental > patch unmask version 1.9.3 with /etc/portage/package.unmask and see if > the /video output gives you the right information. > If I get 10 repo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Nested die error

2005-04-14 Thread Olivier Crête
On Thu, 2005-14-04 at 16:42 -0500, Caleb Tennis wrote: > So it seems repoman doesn't like nested die calls like this: > > use blah && ( emake foo || die ) > > > But, without the parenthesis > > use blah && emake foo || die > > always dies (the emake functions just fine, but it returns an error