Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Seeds

2006-09-21 Thread Nick Rout
On 9/21/2006, "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> However the behaviour displayed in this list, and in particular this >> thread are downright embarassing. I used to be proud of being a gentoo >> user and following a group of dedicated and clever developers. Now I >> just want to fin

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Seeds

2006-09-21 Thread Nick Rout
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:53:39 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:42:13 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | As Donnie said; if this is the thanks one gets for trying out a new > | idea; then why try at all. > > The complaints are not that Stuart

Re: [gentoo-dev] Where are the x86/i686 2006.0 packages?

2006-03-28 Thread Nick Rout
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:07:30 -0600 Andrew Gaffney wrote: > Nick Rout wrote: > > Wanting to do a quick GRP install on a couple of machines this weekend. > > Am told by the install docs that the GRP packages for i686 (or x86, its > > a bit confusing) are on the Installer Live

[gentoo-dev] Where are the x86/i686 2006.0 packages?

2006-03-28 Thread Nick Rout
ncluded in /usr/portage/packages, but no! So where the hell are they? (please :) -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Clarification of packages cd's for 2005.1

2005-09-16 Thread Nick Rout
Thanks for the clarification Chris. On a semi-related matter I was looking for the catalyst .spec files, and see a thread pointing at cvs, however I believe that as a non-dev mortal I can't get access to gentoo cvs. Is that so? If it is then how does one get the spec files? The old catalyst howto

[gentoo-dev] Clarification of packages cd's for 2005.1

2005-09-15 Thread Nick Rout
between my desktop and my p3 laptop, which is compiled for 686. -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] trouble with make_desktop_entry

2005-08-28 Thread Nick Rout
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:54:41 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 28 August 2005 09:42 pm, Nick Rout wrote: > > 1. the resulting desktop file is called laby-laby.desktop rather than > > just laby.desktop > > the name doesnt matter just ignore it OK > > > 2

[gentoo-dev] trouble with make_desktop_entry

2005-08-28 Thread Nick Rout
r: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/eutils.eclass,v 1.194 2005/08/09 22:40:39 vapier Exp $ -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] win4lin-sources

2005-08-25 Thread Nick Rout
sorry forget that, bugs.g.o had a sorta answer. cheers. On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:29:11 +1200 Nick Rout wrote: > > is there a reason for this? > > -- > Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTE

[gentoo-dev] win4lin-sources

2005-08-25 Thread Nick Rout
am i right in saying this package has disappeared quite recently? I am not sure when I previously updated eix, but I just did so now and win4lin-sources have gone. Some guy on g-user was asking and i was just trying to help him out. is there a reason for this? -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [gentoo-dev] download problem in ebuild

2005-08-23 Thread Nick Rout
gt; -- > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] download problem in ebuild

2005-08-23 Thread Nick Rout
he license permits it, repackage it > > Marius So am I being told that you can't change stuff from make.conf per ebuild? That would fix it I think. FETCHCOMMAND="${FETCHCOMMAND} -O laby.${PV}" -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] download problem in ebuild

2005-08-22 Thread Nick Rout
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 11:38 +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote: > Why not use http://laby.toybox.de/download15/laby_1.0.1.tar.gz ? > Or http://laby.toybox.de/download15/${PN}_${PV}.tar.gz unfortunately that still seems to redirect and produce the same problem with wget. -- Nick Rout &

[gentoo-dev] download problem in ebuild

2005-08-22 Thread Nick Rout
when operated through portage, will append the -O, or I am wondering if there is a way to over-ride the default fetching behaviour in the ebuild itself, something like: DOWNLOAD_CMD="wget http://laby.toybox.de/download15/ -O laby_$(P).tar.gz" -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --