Alexandru Mincu wrote:
> Hi all,
> I don't know if this has come up before so excuse me if I am repeating.
> I recently stumbled upon the following Linux distribution:
> http://www.gobolinux.org/
> They have an idea that Mac OS X implemented it when it first came out to
> be more user friendly.
> T
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò schrieb:
> As per summary, net-im/kopete is going away (again).
> For a while upstrem released some versions out of the KDE release cycle
> (0.12_alpha through 0.12.2), but now 0.12.3 was merged again inside
> kdenetwork-3.5.5, so the point of having it in net-im is gone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring wrote:
> he meant mpg123 (as-is), and/or mpg321 (gpl2), not mpeg123...
>
> ~harring
Right, I did, my bad... Thanks for the correction :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFE6Qts6q4f+IV6B/wRAguuAJ4y9B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Abhay Kedia wrote:
> Can someone suggest an appropriate alternate please?
I don't know if it's appropriate since I never used alsaplayer, but
mpeg123 is a good player for "Just play me this file on a console
without much hassle". Other candidates woul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> To be fair, do *you* actually look through *all* the emerge
> output if there's any "D" flag, without the risk of overlooking
> it someday ?
Yes.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFE16tG6q4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Well, we would hope that people using the package would file a
bug, but
> this obviously doesn't always happen.
A little request here: Please don't mass-file bugs with a single
sentence like "It works, please stabilise.". At
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
> If a user isn't syncing and updating at least once a month, well... the
> ebuilds and related files remain available from viewCVS, which is open to
> the public, so they can still be retrieved and stuck in an overlay, if
> necessary, an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
> Not really, tightvnc isn't on this list ... is there some reason you
> can't use it instead?
tightvnc doesn't provide the vnc.so module for X. x11vnc can do the
job, but it's unstable for me and quite sluggish...
-BEGIN
