Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: RESTRICT=interactive

2006-10-13 Thread Michael Stewart (vericgar)
Donnie Berkholz wrote: > It still doesn't make sense. Restricting any other feature disallows it. > Restricting interaction allows it. Find a word that's the antonym of > interactive, and restrict that. RESTRICT="automate" or similar should work, as this flags the ebuild as interactive and so wont

[gentoo-dev] Apache: old-style configuration end-of-life

2006-02-10 Thread Michael Stewart (vericgar)
This is a heads up for anyone that hasn't seen the notices placed in various places... On March 1, the old-style configuration of apache will no longer be supported, in favor of the new-style configuration which was marked stable back in October. If you haven't upgraded, now is the time to do so.

Re: [gentoo-dev] apache2 default for 2006.0

2005-11-29 Thread Michael Stewart (vericgar)
Chris Gianelloni wrote: > I'd like to add the apache2 USE flag to 2006.0's profile. This would > not resolve bug #95140, but would keep users from hitting it by default. > With apache being such a popular package, having it fail from a default > stage3 installation reflects poorly on us all. If I

[gentoo-dev] Stabilization of new-style Apache

2005-09-07 Thread Michael Stewart (vericgar)
The Gentoo Apache Team is pleased to announce the stabilizing of package updates that have been in the works for over a year. Some of the major changes include: - New configuration and configuration locations to more closely match upstream and reduce confusion for users coming from other di