Richard Freeman wrote:
Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
I would prefer to analyze the causes of the slacker arch (manpower,
hardware, etc) and if we are not able to solve the problem by any way
(asking for new devs, buying hardware, etc) go for mark it as
experimental and drop all stable keywords
Mark Loeser wrote:
Jose Luis Rivero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Mark, I think you are looking at the problem only with the ebuild
maintainer hat put on. We have other players in our business, being one of
them the users. This policy would bring too many problems to them so ..
nono by m
) and if we are not able to solve the problem by any way
(asking for new devs, buying hardware, etc) go for mark it as
experimental and drop all stable keywords.
Thanks.
--
Jose Luis Rivero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/Alpha Gentoo/Doc
.
--
Jose Luis Rivero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/Doc Gentoo/Alpha
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 06:17:12PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:59:39 +0200
> Jose Luis Rivero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > EAPI-2 to EAPI-0 could imply lot of changes (not talking about what is
> > going to happen when we release new and
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 05:38:34PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 02:03 Tue 14 Oct , Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
> >
> > There are some others sceneries but are not so common as the one presented
> > could be. Any decent solution for this case?
>
> There are only
pears
affecting both. UPSTREAM release foo-3 to solve the security issue.
There are some others sceneries but are not so common as the one presented
could be. Any decent solution for this case?
--
Jose Luis Rivero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/Doc Gentoo/Alpha
sics of robotics
although I have no current experience with the apps.
Please, contact me out of the list and we'll see how can we improve
the robotics support in Gentoo.
Thanks Zhu.
--
Jose Luis Rivero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/Doc Gentoo/Alpha
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
for the offer, let's continue talking about it in private
mails.
--
Jose Luis Rivero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/Doc Gentoo/Alpha
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
in this area where we
(developers) have different points of view.
[1] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_149120.xml
--
Jose Luis Rivero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/Doc Gentoo/Alpha
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
/2007/11/24/proposing-more-use-flag-documentation
[2] http://blog.cardoe.com/archives/2007/11/23/metadataxml-updates-examples/
--
Jose Luis Rivero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/Doc Gentoo/Alpha
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
/msg_144008.xml
[2] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_144455.xml
--
Jose Luis Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo/Doc Gentoo/Alpha
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
I'm missing some people in the nominees list which everytime they appear
is to give solutions or ideas in a positive way, what for me is a
pleasure to find:
dsd (Daniel Drake)
lu_zero (Luca Barbato)
zmedico (Zac Medico)
Thanks.
--
Jose Luis Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo/Doc G
or those of you worried out there: *NO*. Gentoo/Alpha is *not*
going to have a different default package manager than the rest of Gentoo ;)
--
Life is not so serious, leave the flames and find a real vicious.
Jose Luis Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo/Doc Gentoo/Alpha
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
e the great job doing by our games herd (one of the
best out there) but, in this case, this is not the way to follow.
Thanks.
--
Jose Luis Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo/Doc Gentoo/Alpha
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
esn't block the nomination.
Thanks.
--
Jose Luis Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo/Doc Gentoo/Alpha
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:21:30AM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
Is staking, poking out of the eyes and burning of hands considered a
warm welcome? :-)
Must have missed a few memo's. I thought only YoswinK was allowed to do
this.
You know some people want to use my met
17 matches
Mail list logo
