Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage local package revisions

2006-10-21 Thread Joel Martin
Simon Stelling wrote: [Sat Oct 21 2006, 09:27:24AM EDT] > This only assures that your version will be preferred as long as the > version number is the same, but is really not what malverian is after. true. -- Joel Martin (kanaka) Open Source no BILL . no GATES

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage local package revisions

2006-10-21 Thread Joel Martin
ed by repoman in addition to policy changes. > > - The new (completely backward compatible) version priority order would be: > > apache-2.0.58 > apache-2.0.58-r1 > apache-2.0.58-r2 > apache-2.0.58-r2-local1 > apache-2.0.58-r2-local2 > apache-2.0.58-r3 > apache-2.0.59 > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > Joel Martin (kanaka) Open Source no BILL . no GATES Costs nothing . Open to all pgp7wmNuCLafO.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.12-r2 request for testers

2005-06-04 Thread Joel Martin
Works for me. One x86 laptop with wireless and one x86 desktop also with wireless. -- Joel Martin (kanaka) Mike Frysinger wrote: [Wed Jun 01 2005, 09:59:11PM EDT] > On Wednesday 25 May 2005 06:20 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > yes, it's finally that time ... after months of hear