[gentoo-dev] python and frieds installs test code

2021-04-22 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
I have noted that python, portage and gentoolkit appers to install many MB of what appers to be test code: python: /usr/lib/python*/test, /usr/lib/python*/ctypes/test, /usr/lib/python*/lib2to3/tests, /usr/lib/python*/unittest, /usr/lib/python*/distutils/tests ... portage/gentoolkit: /us

Re: [gentoo-dev] unmasking java 11 on gentoo (for those that maintain packages where java is involved, either directly or conditionally)

2021-04-15 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 16:35 +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 18:28 +0200, Miroslav Šulc wrote: > > Dne 15. 04. 21 v 17:56 Joakim Tjernlund napsal(a): > > > On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 17:21 +0200, Miroslav Šulc wrote: > > > > Dne 15. 04. 21 v 1

Re: [gentoo-dev] unmasking java 11 on gentoo (for those that maintain packages where java is involved, either directly or conditionally)

2021-04-15 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 18:28 +0200, Miroslav Šulc wrote: > Dne 15. 04. 21 v 17:56 Joakim Tjernlund napsal(a): > > On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 17:21 +0200, Miroslav Šulc wrote: > > > Dne 15. 04. 21 v 16:34 Joakim Tjernlund napsal(a): > > > > On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 09

Re: [gentoo-dev] unmasking java 11 on gentoo (for those that maintain packages where java is involved, either directly or conditionally)

2021-04-15 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 17:21 +0200, Miroslav Šulc wrote: > Dne 15. 04. 21 v 16:34 Joakim Tjernlund napsal(a): > > On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 09:45 +0200, Miroslav Šulc wrote: > > > in case the package does not work with java > 1.8 (still, i suggest we > > > first try to r

Re: [gentoo-dev] unmasking java 11 on gentoo (for those that maintain packages where java is involved, either directly or conditionally)

2021-04-15 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 09:45 +0200, Miroslav Šulc wrote: > > in case the package does not work with java > 1.8 (still, i suggest we > first try to resolve the issue before we use this restriction as it > might cause some issues in the future) > virtual/jdk:1.8 > virtual/jre:1.8 This does not se

[gentoo-dev] anongit.gentoo.org/repo/sync/gentoo.git not syncing any more?

2020-10-28 Thread Joakim Tjernlund

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/4] dev-util/jenkins-bin: bump to v2.204.1

2019-12-27 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Wed, 2019-12-25 at 16:11 +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > > > Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.82, Repoman-2.3.20 > Signed

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 7 can be used in the Gentoo repository

2018-05-06 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Great news :) W.r.t the new support for cross building, it would be grep if the eclass user could make use of the new --prefix support in recent shadow utilities so users can be added to cross ROOT. Jocke On Sun, 2018-05-06 at 18:52 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: EAPI 7 has been approved by the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Managing updates on many identical Gentoo systems

2018-01-18 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Thu, 1970-01-01 at 00:00 +, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > > > Hi everyone, > > I'm trying to design an update system f

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] toolchain.eclass: set CHOST for gcc-config calls

2016-12-27 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 00:22 -0800, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 12/26/2016 12:22 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/603776 > > --- > >  eclass/toolchain.eclass | 8 > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/eclass/toolchain.eclass b/ecla

Re: [gentoo-dev] grub-2 configuration

2016-10-28 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 11:03 -0400, Tom H wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Joakim Tjernlund > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 15:21 -0400, Tom H wrote: > > > > > > > > > but it looks like, unlike for grub-legacy, you need a grub con

Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item

2016-10-25 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 16:07 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 25/10/16 04:02 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 15:41 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > > > > > On 25/10/16 03:32 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item

2016-10-25 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 15:41 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 25/10/16 03:32 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > > > On 25/10/16 03:08 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 20:11 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item

2016-10-25 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 20:11 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:32:22 + > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > > Noticed todays 2016-10-25-llvm_3_9_with_llvm_targets news item and read: > > .. > > In order to enable all targets, add the f

[gentoo-dev] LLVM News item

2016-10-25 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Noticed todays 2016-10-25-llvm_3_9_with_llvm_targets news item and read: .. In order to enable all targets, add the following to your /etc/portage/package.use or equivalent file:   sys-devel/llvm LLVM_TARGETS: *   sys-devel/clang LLVM_TARGETS: * ... I would like to control such variables(LLVM_TAR

Re: [gentoo-dev] grub-2 configuration

2016-10-19 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 15:21 -0400, Tom H wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Joakim Tjernlund > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2016-10-18 at 12:45 -0400, Tom H wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:54 AM, M. J. Everitt > > > wrote: &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] grub-2 configuration

2016-10-18 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Tue, 2016-10-18 at 12:45 -0400, Tom H wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:54 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > > > > On 11/10/16 15:42, Tom H wrote: > > > > > > > > > You can use exactly the same text in 40_grub that you'd use in > > > grub.cfg and have the latter generated. > > > > That's a usefu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mirrors corrupts?

2016-10-08 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 18:07 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Sat, 8 Oct 2016 14:52:13 + > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > > Tried several mirrors and I still get: > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=596462 Thanks, I added myself to CC list

[gentoo-dev] Mirrors corrupts?

2016-10-08 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Tried several mirrors and I still get: gentoo-jocke gentoo64 # emerge -avNDuv world [ebuild U ] x11-libs/libX11-1.6.4 [1.6.3] USE="ipv6 -doc -static-libs {-test}" ABI_X86="32 (64) (-x32)"  [ebuild U ] x11-libs/libXfixes-5.0.3 [5.0.2] USE="-static-libs" ABI_X86="(64) -32 (-x32)"  [ebuild 

Re: [gentoo-dev] XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=(null) when root logs in

2016-10-05 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 00:18 +0800, konsolebox wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Joakim Tjernlund > wrote: > > > > Whenever root logs in(ssh or on text console) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR is set to > > "(null)". This > > creates a /(null) dir. with various s

Re: [gentoo-dev] XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=(null) when root logs in

2016-10-05 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 00:04 +0800, Jason Zaman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:58:44PM +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 23:10 +0800, Jason Zaman wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 02:58:20PM +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=(null) when root logs in

2016-10-05 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 23:10 +0800, Jason Zaman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 02:58:20PM +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > I know this might be a bit off topic but I just want some clues > > > > Whenever root logs in(ssh or on text console) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR is

[gentoo-dev] XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=(null) when root logs in

2016-10-05 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
I know this might be a bit off topic but I just want some clues Whenever root logs in(ssh or on text console) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR is set to "(null)". This creates a /(null) dir. with various stuff in it. I am trying to find out what sets XDG_RUNTIME_DIR? We auth. against Windows AD using sssd, but

[gentoo-dev] Bug 548208 - net-fs/nfs-utils: enable gssproxy support (to replace rpc-svcgssd) seems forgotten?

2016-09-12 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Could someone from core systems look at   https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=548208 and "unbreak" unstable nfs-utils for openrc, please? Jocke

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gtk/gtk2/gtk3 USE flag situation

2016-05-30 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 18:21 -0400, NP-Hardass wrote: > On 05/27/2016 06:05 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > > On 05/27/2016 02:45 PM, NP-Hardass wrote: > > > Not on hand, but as the MATE maintainer, I can tell you that starting > > > with MATE-1.14, two packages are gtk3 only, and starting with 1.16, f

Re: [gentoo-dev] [EAPI 7] Cross-compile improvements (BDEPEND, BROOT, sysroot)

2015-12-06 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 09:28 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 23:20:05 + > James Le Cuirot wrote: > > > On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 12:40:08 +0100 > > Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 22:58:55 + > > > James Le Cuirot wrote: > > > [...]   > > > > > > > > I rais

Re: [gentoo-dev] [EAPI 7] Cross-compile improvements (BDEPEND, BROOT, sysroot)

2015-12-03 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 23:32 +, James Le Cuirot wrote: > On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 08:22:01 + > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > There's also a further complication here that I forgot to mention to > > > mgorny. While calling configure with --with-sysroot certainl

Re: [gentoo-dev] [EAPI 7] Cross-compile improvements (BDEPEND, BROOT, sysroot)

2015-12-03 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 22:58 +, James Le Cuirot wrote: >  [SNIP really good writeup, thanks :)] > There's also a further complication here that I forgot to mention to > mgorny. While calling configure with --with-sysroot certainly helps, > it still stumbles on a significant number of packages

[gentoo-dev] https://packages.gentoo.org/ and Changelogs

2015-09-17 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
The Changelogs on https://packages.gentoo.org/ are old, from before the git migration. Could this be fixed? Jocke

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New Project: MATE

2015-09-16 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 21:50 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El jue, 02-07-2015 a las 15:40 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió: > > Greetings all, > > > > Looking for some feedback on creating a new project and herd for the > > MATE Desktop environment. The goal, like many other DE based > > projects, > > is

[gentoo-dev] Where did vanilla-sources-3.14.x go?

2015-08-16 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
vanilla-sources 3.14.x is gone from the tree. Jocke

Re: [gentoo-dev] Managing etc/* in an embbeded system

2015-08-11 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 10:55 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > On 08/11/2015 10:48 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 08:47 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > > > On 07/23/2015 12:46 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 19:47

Re: [gentoo-dev] Managing etc/* in an embbeded system

2015-08-11 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 08:47 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > On 07/23/2015 12:46 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 19:47 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > > > > > Sent from an iPhone, sorry for the HTML... > > > > > > >

SV: Re: [gentoo-dev] Managing etc/* in an embbeded system

2015-07-23 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 19:47 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> >> Sent from an iPhone, sorry for the HTML... >> >>> On Jul 22, 2015, at 5:38 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Joakim Tjer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Managing etc/* in an embbeded system

2015-07-23 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 19:47 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > Sent from an iPhone, sorry for the HTML... > > > On Jul 22, 2015, at 5:38 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Joakim Tjernlund > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Managing etc/* in an embbeded system

2015-07-22 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 22:38 +0800, Jason Zaman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 01:20:10PM +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 14:30 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > Joakim Tjernlund napisał: > > > > > > > We got an emb

Re: [gentoo-dev] Managing etc/* in an embbeded system

2015-07-22 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 16:39 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-07-22, o godz. 13:20:10 > Joakim Tjernlund napisał(a): > > > On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 14:30 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > Joakim Tjernlund napisał: > > > > > > > We

Re: [gentoo-dev] Managing etc/* in an embbeded system

2015-07-22 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 14:30 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > Joakim Tjernlund napisał: > > > We got an embedded gentoo system where we need to manage many conf > > files under /etc that we have > > modified and should be under our control when an SW upgrade is >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Managing etc/* in an embbeded system

2015-07-22 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 07:14 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:17 AM, Panagiotis Christopoulos > wrote: > > > > you can subscribe to gentoo-embedded mailing list and ask there, as your > > product > > is embedded. Also, man make.conf and search for CONFIG_PROTECT. If I > > u

[gentoo-dev] Managing etc/* in an embbeded system

2015-07-22 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
We got an embedded gentoo system where we need to manage many conf files under /etc that we have modified and should be under our control when an SW upgrade is performed. Cloning every ebuild where we have modified its conf file(s) under /etc feels awkward so I am looking for some other way to d

Re: [gentoo-dev] Impl. egetent in user.eclass using script from sys-apps/getent?

2015-06-10 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 18:48 +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 04:44:17PM +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > I wonder if it would be possible to use the script from > > sys-apps/getent(included below) > > to impl. getent in user.eclass instead of us

Re: [gentoo-dev] Impl. egetent in user.eclass using script from sys-apps/getent?

2015-06-10 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 14:06 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 6/10/15 1:52 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Joakim Tjernlund > > wrote: > > > I wonder if it would be possible to use the script from > > > sys-apps/getent(include

[gentoo-dev] Impl. egetent in user.eclass using script from sys-apps/getent?

2015-06-10 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
I wonder if it would be possible to use the script from sys-apps/getent(included below) to impl. getent in user.eclass instead of using glibc's getent? I cannot see any downside, is there one? This would help a lot(just seed your groups/users is in ROOT/etc/{passwd,group ...} first) when cross