On Jun 6, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Aron Griffis wrote:
This is kinda bloggish, because it's basically a transcription of an
IRC monologue. My apologies if it's hard to follow... Nonetheless,
I'm interested in how other developers feel on the topics I bring up
below.
overlay capabilities are under
I like the xml generation pass but i have a few questions:
does the xml-publish transaction lend a greater window of opportunity
for mirror rsync de-sync?
does it make sense for digest info be sucked up into the xml pass, to
be superceded by the legacy files where present ala
ebuild x-y/
overall I'm quite pleased with genkernel and have relegated much
tedium to its functions over time. perhaps it's a worthy mule for
more responsibility.
I have mirror volumes which have survived almost 8 years with 2nd and
third generation drives, motherboard, and architecture (32->64 bit).
