Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Michael Curtis Napier

2005-07-06 Thread Haas Wernfried
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:25:32AM +0300, Alin Dobre wrote: > You juuust couldn't stand your yahoo address and thought to sign in for > a free gentoo address, didn't you? :) > One big welcome, Curtis! Now everyone using yahoo will start asking "Anyone got a spare G(entoo)-mail invite?" ;-) Congra

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 38 round two

2005-06-29 Thread Haas Wernfried
Hi, On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 12:27:31AM +0100, Ricardo Loureiro wrote: > Just a question, will there be a different group for moderators that > belong to staff and moderators which doesn't belong? I think this is not planned at the moment. > I'm asking this > because users may relate different gro

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 38: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project

2005-06-28 Thread Haas Wernfried
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:34:35AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > Honestly, we call everyone with an @gentoo.org address a developer, > whether they are a "developer" (CVS access) or not. There have been heavy objections against that when we presented the first draft of the glep using the term d

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 38: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project

2005-06-27 Thread Haas Wernfried
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 05:19:18PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > If they do not speak the language well, I'm sure we can find someone to > translate the quiz and their answers between English and their native > tongue. Not an option, English is a requirement. See my previous mail. > As for unw

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 38: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project

2005-06-27 Thread Haas Wernfried
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:07:50PM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Monday 27 June 2005 22:50, Haas Wernfried wrote: > > What would you suggest to do with the people > > that are either unable (because they don't speak English (well)) to > > take i

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 38: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project

2005-06-27 Thread Haas Wernfried
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 10:31:04PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 09:47:02PM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote: > > There are several possible solutions: > > a) Require all the existing moderators to do the quiz in some time > > (months?). Please don't say that it is hard, I've d

[gentoo-dev] GLEP 38: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project

2005-06-27 Thread Haas Wernfried
Hi, With reference to the recent thread about this GLEP's draft [1] we're resurrecting the discussion and would like keep you updated on the latest changes: 1) The term developer has been dropped and replaced by staff. ;-) 2) The GLEP is now listed on the GLEP page as GLEP 38 [2] as an official GLE

Re: [gentoo-dev] New GLEP draft: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project

2005-06-18 Thread Haas Wernfried
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 02:15:22AM +0100, Roy Marples wrote: > As an ex site/forum admin (non Gentoo) I really have to ask what kind of > "quality assurance" you're dealing with here. Our current procedure is that we think quite a lot about whom to make moderator and whom not. This procedure has ne

Re: [gentoo-dev] New GLEP draft: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project

2005-06-17 Thread Haas Wernfried
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:29:32PM -0700, Rob Cakebread wrote: > I think the first sentence should say "staff" rather than "developer": There also was a little discussion on irc about this topic a few minutes ago. Please refer to this part of the glep: "In this document the term developer is used f

Re: [gentoo-dev] New GLEP draft: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project

2005-06-17 Thread Haas Wernfried
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:27:37PM -0400, Jonathan Smith wrote: > Jan Kundrát wrote: > > IMHO if you don't require moderators of Local Forums to accept and > > follow same guidelines as the global moderators, you're actually against > > the point of "Moderator as Gentoo authority". The main proble

Re: [gentoo-dev] where goes Gentoo?

2005-06-07 Thread Haas Wernfried
Hi, On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 03:18:03PM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote: > > Maybe i've just gotten your statement really wrong, but as far > > i understand it, i really have a bad feeling about it. > [..] > I hope that this clears up your confusion and puts us on the same team > again. Yeah, that cleare