Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-13 Thread David Morgan
On 16:17 Tue 13 Jun , Peter wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:17:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > | Care to elaborate? The wise, all-knowing Zen argument isn't | > > particularly helpful > > > > It's perfect proof that there are users that are utterly clueless about > > what is best for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting Important Updates To Users

2005-10-31 Thread David Morgan
On 19:05 Mon 31 Oct , Stuart Herbert wrote: > > Maybe we could add a big news warning in the next minor portage > > update that when you tells you about the new news features (perhaps a > > big einfo after you upgrade. > > The problems of einfo messages not reaching our users have been well >

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Bugzilla HOWTO Update

2005-07-10 Thread David Morgan
On 15:57 Sun 10 Jul , Daniel Drake wrote: > How to give us lots of yummy info: > - How to apply patches > - How to use strace > - How to identify a configure failure > - and how to upload config.log > - How to use gdb, for C apps > - Using valgrind? > etc Tigger wrote a doc about writing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed security policy for web-based apps

2005-07-05 Thread David Morgan
> > 1. The Gentoo package's maintainer will identify one *named* contact > >UPSTREAM for security-related matters, and one named general contact > >UPSTREAM (as a fallback for when the security contact is > >unreachable). And what happens if upstream is only one person? -- djm --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of articles.xml from website

2005-06-09 Thread David Morgan
On 18:59 Thu 09 Jun , Alec Warner wrote: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > >It would still be useful to keep the titles and other info, just > >removing the link. Otherwise, how are people supposed to even know the > >articles exist? > > > >Thanks, > >Donnie > > I have to agree here, something