On 16:17 Tue 13 Jun , Peter wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:17:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > | Care to elaborate? The wise, all-knowing Zen argument isn't |
> > particularly helpful
> >
> > It's perfect proof that there are users that are utterly clueless about
> > what is best for
On 19:05 Mon 31 Oct , Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > Maybe we could add a big news warning in the next minor portage
> > update that when you tells you about the new news features (perhaps a
> > big einfo after you upgrade.
>
> The problems of einfo messages not reaching our users have been well
>
On 15:57 Sun 10 Jul , Daniel Drake wrote:
> How to give us lots of yummy info:
> - How to apply patches
> - How to use strace
> - How to identify a configure failure
> - and how to upload config.log
> - How to use gdb, for C apps
> - Using valgrind?
> etc
Tigger wrote a doc about writing
> > 1. The Gentoo package's maintainer will identify one *named* contact
> >UPSTREAM for security-related matters, and one named general contact
> >UPSTREAM (as a fallback for when the security contact is
> >unreachable).
And what happens if upstream is only one person?
--
djm
--
On 18:59 Thu 09 Jun , Alec Warner wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> >It would still be useful to keep the titles and other info, just
> >removing the link. Otherwise, how are people supposed to even know the
> >articles exist?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Donnie
>
> I have to agree here, something