Brian Harring wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 10:28:48PM +0200, David Klaftenegger wrote:
>>Why not just create a symlink to the package in the category it *also*
>>should be in?
>>
>>For example, net-mail/mutt could be a symlink to ../mail-client/mutt,
>>allow
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> Would it be inappropriate to start bitching (again) about a flat tree
> where each package can go in multiple categories?
So now, that I've read all messages in this thread, I needed a point to
start at..
I guess my approach isn't a way to go, but I can't find the reason
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:29:58 -0700 Drake Wyrm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | While you're at it, get rid of nano, too. None of the packages
> | *require* it, either. That would save almost 800k! Woo!
>
> nano isn't in system.
>
# emerge -pve system | grep nano
[ebuild N
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 22 April 2005 05:49 pm, David Klaftenegger wrote:
>
>>Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:29:58 -0700 Drake Wyrm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>| While you're at it, get rid of nano, too. None of the
