Re: [gentoo-dev] VPopmail - SUID vchkpw

2005-07-20 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
efore-smtp style relay access. So, though I do rely on it, it's an add-on feature that many opt not to use. Cheers, -- Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info [EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653 AIM & Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ: 1494523 SeattleServer.com, Inc. | http://www.seattle

Re: [gentoo-dev] VPopmail - SUID vchkpw

2005-07-20 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
rute-force passwords, too, but it's suid by default. Maybe what is needed is an extension to suidctl where emerge checks any installed binaries against things present in suidctl.conf that *should* be made suid if they're listed in there even if they're not suid by default? Cheer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Abuse by gentoo developer

2005-07-19 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
n a disagreement. However I don't see how anything I said taken in the worst conceivable manner would lead to such a negative response. Oh well. Thanks for the advice in this thread, and sorry for bringing this up here where it doesn't really belong. Cheers, -- Casey Allen Shobe | http

Re: [gentoo-dev] VPopmail - SUID vchkpw

2005-07-19 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
equest for the QA team. I tend to stay away from most ~arch packages simply because most of our systems are live production servers, but I'd be happy to test-drive new ebuilds of vpopmail if it would help get new versions into the stable tree faster. Cheers, -- Casey Allen Shobe | ht

[gentoo-dev] Abuse by gentoo developer

2005-07-19 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
ail itself. Jory wrote this rather rude reply: ------- Casey Allen Shobe wrote: > Well I patched the ebuild and got it working, but I'm so terribly > disappointed with vpopmail's horrible postgresql support that I > don't think I'll be using it at

Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild development (vpopmail, etc.)

2005-07-18 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
round. I'm much more inclined to just fix the problem instead of complaining about it because of past experiences involving reporting hundreds of bugs, many of which are not fixed to this day 2 years later. Cheers, -- Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info [EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425

Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild development (vpopmail, etc.)

2005-07-18 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
On Monday 18 July 2005 06:57, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 22:07 -0700, Anthony Gorecki wrote: > > On Sunday, July 17, 2005 9:26 pm, Casey Allen Shobe wrote: > > > I'm also a bit confused about the portdir_overlay thing - If > > > there exists a -r

[gentoo-dev] ebuild development (vpopmail, etc.)

2005-07-17 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
ctly? I'm also a bit confused about the portdir_overlay thing - If there exists a -r15, do I then add a -r16 to make emerge realize an update is available. What happens then when an -r16 hits the regular portage tree? Thanks for any information you can provide. Cheers, -- Casey All

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-server] gluelog ebuild?

2005-05-05 Thread Casey Allen Shobe - SeattleServer Mailing Lists
On Thursday 05 May 2005 09:14, Casey Allen Shobe - SeattleServer Mailing Lists wrote: > So, I typed in "emerge gluelog" and realized quickly that this package is > not maintained and should probably be masked, as it creates /etc/rc.d, and > puts init scripts in /etc/rc.d/ini

[gentoo-dev] gluelog ebuild?

2005-05-05 Thread Casey Allen Shobe - SeattleServer Mailing Lists
multilog-based system could be created? Cheers, -- Casey Allen Shobe | SeattleServer, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653 http://www.seattleserver.com -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP5 Unstable ?

2005-04-24 Thread Casey Allen Shobe - SeattleServer Mailing Lists
Regarding the remark of not overriding the system, what I ment is that I > there's no reason to manualy unmask a stable product.. I strongly agree. We actually lost a client recently because we adhere to the stable tree of Gentoo but our PHP was too dated for them (they wanted PHP 5.x)