Confirm unsubscribe from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hi,
Am Montag, 29. Okt 2007, 12:41:51 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> On Monday 29 October 2007, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
> > Am Montag, 29. Okt 2007, 08:47:28 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> > > while that sucks, it still does not make it appropriate for this list
> >
>
her the problem was
Gentoo-specific or not.
Bertram
--
Bertram Scharpf
Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany
http://www.bertram-scharpf.de
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hi,
Am Montag, 29. Okt 2007, 07:45:48 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> On Monday 22 October 2007, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
> > when setting up LDAP Pam authentication I encountered a
> > problem that seems to be neither Slapd- nor
> > nss_ldap-specific.
>
> for future ref
Hi,
Am Montag, 22. Okt 2007, 15:30:59 +0200 schrieb Michael Hanselmann:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:12:29PM +0200, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
> > Therefore I suppose the slapd daemon tries to obtain passwd/shadow
> > information for ldap via nss_ldap.
>
> Yes, it does. Therefor
Hi,
Am Montag, 22. Okt 2007, 08:48:59 -0700 schrieb Alec Warner:
> On 10/22/07, Bertram Scharpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a way to determine _what_ nss is asked for?
>
> Sure, turn on nscd in super debug mode and you should see most, if not
> all the request
Hi,
Am Montag, 22. Okt 2007, 13:44:19 +0100 schrieb Benjamin Smee:
> On Monday 22 October 2007 13:12:29 Bertram Scharpf wrote:
> >
> > @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.3.38 (Oct 18 2007 22:12:26) $
> > [EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]:/var/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.3.38/work/
Could this it a real bug in glibc or any of its patches?
Does anybody experience the same behaviour?
Thanks in advance,
Bertram
--
Bertram Scharpf
Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany
http://www.bertram-scharpf.de
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
