Re: [gentoo-dev] mozextension.eclass

2005-12-26 Thread Ben Skeggs
Am Sonntag, den 25.12.2005, 14:00 -0600 schrieb Jory A. Pratt: > > eclass: http://dev.gentoo.org/~anarchy/eclass/mozextension.eclass > firefox-bin: > http://dev.gentoo.org/~anarchy/ebuilds/mozilla-firefox-bin-1.5-r2.ebuild > firefox : > http://dev.gentoo.org/~anarchy/ebuilds/mozilla-firefox-1.5-r5

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X update

2005-12-10 Thread Ben Skeggs
Am Samstag, den 10.12.2005, 17:00 -0800 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ben Skeggs wrote: > | Am Freitag, den 09.12.2005, 23:12 + schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > | > |>2) Users with no X installed will pull in the virtual/x11 p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X update

2005-12-10 Thread Ben Skeggs
Am Freitag, den 09.12.2005, 23:12 + schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > 2) Users with no X installed will pull in the virtual/x11 package > because there is no longer a default virtual. A user in #gentoo-amd64 ran into issues with this that I reproduced in a chroot. On a new install, with no X install

Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-19 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 20:48 +0100, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > I've said it in the first meeting and I'll reiterate: what is the sentiment > of the arch testers in this case (if they are still reading this thread)? > I'm not sure that this topic is worthy of a flame-fest, but anyway.. still reading. :

Re: [gentoo-dev] modular X - 7.0 RC1

2005-10-20 Thread Ben Skeggs
Am Donnerstag, den 20.10.2005, 16:28 +0100 schrieb Herbie Hopkins: > On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 01:46 +1100, Ben Skeggs wrote: > > The only issue I've encountered so far is that XKB appears to be > > completely broken for me. I can't quite track down why at this stage. > &

Re: [gentoo-dev] modular X - 7.0 RC1

2005-10-20 Thread Ben Skeggs
Am Donnerstag, den 20.10.2005, 00:11 -0700 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > Thanks to the dedicated work of Joshua Baergen and me, you've got just > what you asked for -- newer X than even money can buy. Pound on it, test > it, break it, and file bugs. Let us know how it works. > I had some issues updat

Re: [gentoo-dev] X modular migration howto

2005-08-12 Thread Ben Skeggs
Donnie Berkholz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben Skeggs wrote: | I've attached a small test case which demonstrates a problem with event | selection. | I haven't had time yet to try this with XCreateWindow also, but I | imagine I'll see | similar resu

Re: [gentoo-dev] X modular migration howto

2005-08-12 Thread Ben Skeggs
Georgi Georgiev wrote: maillog: 12/08/2005-07:16:10(+1000): Ben Skeggs types Donnie Berkholz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I started a brief migrating to modular X howto, on popular demand. Comments and additions would be appreciated. Just a quick

Re: [gentoo-dev] X modular migration howto

2005-08-11 Thread Ben Skeggs
Donnie Berkholz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I started a brief migrating to modular X howto, on popular demand. Comments and additions would be appreciated. Just a quick note for any brave amd64 users who might want to try this, it seems that something isn't quite ri