Thomas Kahle dixit (2011-03-25, 10:47):
> it says here http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gnupg-user.xml#doc_chap2 that
> the validity should be <6 month. What is the protocol when the expiry
> date is approaching?
“After size comes the expiration date. Here smaller is better, but most
users can go fo
Torsten Veller dixit (2011-03-25, 08:15):
> * Mike Frysinger :
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> [Manifest signing]
> > > Does that get us any closer to GLEPs 57, 58, 59 (or generally
> > > approaching the tree-signing/verifying group of
Andreas K. Huettel dixit (2011-03-25, 09:53):
> > Do you want to reject signed commits if
> > - keys are not publicly available [1]
>
> Yes, since that defies the purpose of the signature.
>
> > - signatures are from expired keys [2]
>
> Yes if the signature was made after expiration. (Dont kno
Jeroen Roovers dixit (2011-03-25, 00:50):
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:59:45 -0400
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> > is there any reason we should allow people to commit unsigned
> > Manifest's anymore ?
>
> Funny that. I only started doing that Yesterday. It had been on my TODO
> for a couple of yea
Alex Alexander dixit (2011-03-05, 01:46):
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 12:32:15AM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Dne 4.3.2011 10:35, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." napsal(a):
> > > # Pawel Hajdan jr (04 Mar 2011)
> > > # Masked for removal in 90 days.
Tomáš Chvátal dixit (2011-02-22, 19:39):
> >>> On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, Francesco R wrote:
> > Build gnuplot with USE="cairo" and you can get PDF output with the
> > "pdfcairo" terminal.
> >>>
> >>> Last time (many moons ago) I've checked cairo did not generated pdf
> >>> it did generated
Konstantin Tokarev dixit (2011-02-10, 13:01):
>
>
> 10.02.2011, 12:56, "Antoni Grzymala" :
> > Fabian Groffen dixit (2011-02-10, 10:39):
> >
> >> On 10-02-2011 07:54:16 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> >>> The only way to avoid epic failur
Fabian Groffen dixit (2011-02-10, 10:39):
> On 10-02-2011 07:54:16 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> > The only way to avoid epic failures is to keep the whole thing simple,
> > without trying to fit everybody. An installer that would cover a
> > standard install, newbie-oriented scenario would be d
Samuli Suominen dixit (2011-02-01, 21:09):
> # Samuli Suominen (01 Feb 2011)
> # Masked for QA because the package has not been installable for an year
> now.
> # See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302456
> # Removal in 30 days
> net-dialup/slmodem
“Thanks Lech, works again! Now, can we
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com
dixit (2011-01-20, 15:06):
> > please fix your stupid e-mail
>
> Meeku: Very good email address.
Since we're onto hares why not shorten it to: tea_party@mad_hatter.uk?
--
[a]
Tim Harder dixit (2010-12-09, 15:26):
> For those of you running postfix, I was wondering if there is any
> interest in having the 2.8 experimental releases added to the tree.
> According to upstream [1] they are production quality so they should run
> as expected but the config setup may change a
Patrick Nagel dixit (2010-10-29, 15:26):
> On 2010-10-29 18:05 UTC cl...@jhcloos.com wrote:
> [garbage, malware attached]
>
> Wow, that's a first, I think ;) Mydoom worm sent to the gentoo-dev list.
I only got information from spamassassin on my server. Was actually
quite surprised to see the se
Tobias Klausmann dixit (2010-09-20, 20:34):
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> > > who runs servers: DHCP is uncommon there, WLAN is very unusual,
> > > as a result, they would not only have to switch the way they
> > > configure their
William Hubbs dixit (2010-09-20, 11:16):
> I want to start a new thread since the discussion on openrc is
> centering on whether we should use oldnet, newnet, or keep both.
>
> The drawback I see for newnet is that it does not allow the user to
> control each interface separately, so if you want
Diego E. Pettenò dixit (2010-05-26, 14:54):
>
> # Diego E. Pettenò (26 May 2010)
> # on behalf of QA team
> #
> # cl-smtp fails to fetch since at least September 2007
> # (bug #193627); cl-pop needs the former.
> #
> # Removal on 2010-07-25
> dev-lisp/cl-smtp
> dev-lisp/cl-pop
cl-smtp has just
Ben de Groot dixit (2010-04-04, 14:31):
> On 4 April 2010 10:48, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone considered the immensely powerful twiki?
>
> No. So tell us why we should. Specifically, how does it compare to
> MediaWiki in terms of features and perfor
Joshua Saddler dixit (2010-04-04, 00:31):
> Show me a wiki that has the flexibility of our handbook, which can be
> a huge printer-friendly all-in-one doc, or an as-you-need-it doc with
> one page per chapter.
>
> Show me a wiki that has built-in intradoc linking to every paragraph,
> chapter, su
Matti Bickel dixit (2010-03-08, 10:39):
> >> A stable user who doesn't want python 3 installed shouldn't have it
> >> forced on them. If something is pulling in python-3 then that
> >> package needs to have its dependencies fixed. IIRC Portage isn't
> >> greedy wrt. SLOTs like it was before (unl
Ulrich Mueller dixit (2010-03-04, 10:32):
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>
> > My proposal would be to call it dev-scm and put all version
> > controls, direct frontends, plugins and the like into that.
>
> Better call it dev-vcs to avoid confusion with both the Scheme
>
Max Arnold dixit (2010-01-29, 12:24):
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:17:41PM +0100, Beber wrote:
> > So, do you guys plan to implement a such thing ? That's one of the
> > features that is mostly missing imho. The principal miss in on
> > client side as I have tools to manage packages but would like
Alex Alexander dixit (2010-01-18, 11:07):
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:05:58AM +0100, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
> > I sometimes think the main problem is the tree itself. Portage really
> > should had a directory of its own, but maybe with anoher structure,
> > like /var/portage, /var/portage/tree
Ben de Groot dixit (2010-01-16, 00:41):
> 2010/1/15 Dawid Węgliński :
> > On Friday 15 January 2010 20:44:43 Alex Legler wrote:
> >> > /var/lib/layman
> >> >
> >> > do well?
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> > -1, /usr/local/layman?
>
> /usr/local/ is a location the system should avoid. Somewhere in /var/
>
Mike Frysinger dixit (2010-01-15, 20:45):
> On Friday 15 January 2010 20:24:38 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> > On 01/16/10 00:33, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> > > - From the alternatives, /var/lib/layman doesn't sound right. If
> > > /var/cache/layman doesn't work, what about /var/spool/layman
Antoni Grzymala dixit (2009-11-30, 12:30):
> Denis Dupeyron dixit (2009-11-25, 14:50):
>
> > The next council meeting will be on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC. If you want
> > us to discuss things please let us know in reply to this email. What
> > is already known is we'll
Denis Dupeyron dixit (2009-11-25, 14:50):
> The next council meeting will be on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC. If you want
> us to discuss things please let us know in reply to this email. What
> is already known is we'll talk about mtime preservation and prefix.
> You can find threads about those at:
> h
25 matches
Mail list logo
